Historical and Revision Notes |
|---|
Puspan. L. 103–272 |
|---|
47113(a) | 49 App.:2204(d)(2). | Sept. 3, 1982, Puspan. L. 97–248, 96 Stat. 324, § 505(d); added Dec. 30, 1987, Puspan. L. 100–223, § 105(f), 101 Stat. 1493; Oct. 31, 1992, Puspan. L. 102–581, § 117(c), 106 Stat. 4883. |
47113(span) | 49 App.:2204(d)(1). | |
47113(c) | 49 App.:2204(d)(4). | |
47113(d) | 49 App.:2204(d)(3). | |
In subsection (a)(1)(B), the words “or individuals” are omitted because of 1:1.
In subsection (a)(2), the reference is to section 8(c) of the Act because 15:637(d) was redesignated as 15:637(c) by section 3 of the Women’s Business Development Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–191, 105 Stat. 1591).
In subsection (span), the words “beginning after September 30, 1987” are omitted as obsolete.
Puspan. L. 103–429This amends 49:47113(a)(2) to correct erroneous cross-references.
Editorial Notes
References in TextSection 31(span) of the Small Business Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), is classified to section 657a(span) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
The date of enactment of this subsection, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), is the date of enactment of Puspan. L. 112–95, which was approved Fespan. 14, 2012.
Amendments2024—Subsec. (f). Puspan. L. 118–63 added subsec. (f).
2018—Subsec. (a)(1). Puspan. L. 115–254, § 150, amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: “ ‘small business concern’—
“(A) has the same meaning given that term in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632); but
“(B) does not include a concern, or group of concerns controlled by the same socially and economically disadvantaged individual, that has average annual gross receipts over the prior 3 fiscal years of more than $16,015,000, as adjusted by the Secretary of Transportation for inflation;”.
Subsec. (a)(3). Puspan. L. 115–254, § 539(o), substituted “(15 U.S.C. 632(p))” for “(15 U.S.C. 632(o))”.
2017—Subsec. (a)(3). Puspan. L. 115–91 substituted “section 31(span) of the Small Business Act” for “section 3(p) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(o))”.
2012—Subsec. (e). Puspan. L. 112–95 added subsec. (e).
1997—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 105–135, § 604(h)(2)(A), substituted semicolon for period at end of par. (1), substituted “; and” for period at end of par. (2), and added par. (3).
Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 105–135, § 604(h)(2)(B), inserted “or qualified HUBZone small business concerns” before period at end.
1994—Subsec. (a)(2). Puspan. L. 103–429 substituted “8(d)” for “8(c)” in two places and “637(d))” for “637(c))”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2017 AmendmentAmendment by Puspan. L. 115–91 effective Jan. 1, 2020, see section 1701(j) of Puspan. L. 115–91, set out as a note under section 657a of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Effective Date of 1997 AmendmentAmendment by Puspan. L. 105–135 effective Oct. 1, 1997, see section 3 of Puspan. L. 105–135, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
Effective Date of 1994 AmendmentAmendment by Puspan. L. 103–429 effective July 5, 1994, see section 9 of Puspan. L. 103–429, set out as a note under section 321 of this title.
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ProgramPuspan. L. 115–254, div. B, title I, § 157, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3218, as amended by Puspan. L. 118–63, title VII, § 751, May 16, 2024, 138 Stat. 1284, provided that:“(a)Findings.—Congress finds the following:“(1) While significant progress has occurred due to the establishment of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program (sections 47107(e) and 47113 of title 49, United States Code), discrimination and related barriers continue to pose significant obstacles for minority- and women-owned businesses seeking to do business in airport-related markets across the Nation. These continuing barriers merit the continuation of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program.
“(2) Congress has received and reviewed testimony and documentation of race and gender discrimination from numerous sources, including congressional hearings and roundtables, scientific reports, reports issued by public and private agencies, news stories, reports of discrimination by organizations and individuals, and discrimination lawsuits. This testimony and documentation shows that race- and gender-neutral efforts alone are insufficient to address the problem.
“(3) This testimony and documentation demonstrates that discrimination across the Nation poses a barrier to full and fair participation in airport-related businesses of women business owners and minority business owners in the racial groups detailed in parts 23 and 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and has impacted firm development and many aspects of airport-related business in the public and private markets.
“(4) This testimony and documentation provides a strong basis that there is a compelling need for the continuation of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise [“DBE”] program and the airport concessions disadvantaged business enterprise [“ACDBE”] program to address race and gender discrimination in airport-related business.
“(span)Prompt Payments.—“(1)Reporting of complaints.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall ensure that each airport that participates in the Program tracks, and reports to the Administrator, the number of covered complaints made in relation to activities at that airport.
“(2)Improving compliance.—“(A)In general.—The Administrator shall take actions to assess and improve compliance with prompt payment requirements under part 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
“(B)Contents of assessment.—In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall assess—“(i) whether requirements relating to the inclusion of prompt payment language in contracts are being satisfied;
“(ii) whether and how airports are enforcing prompt payment requirements;
“(iii) the processes by which covered complaints are received and resolved by airports;
“(iv) whether improvements need to be made to— “(I) better track covered complaints received by airports; and
“(II) assist the resolution of covered complaints in a timely manner;
“(v) whether changes to prime contractor specifications need to be made to ensure prompt payments to subcontractors; and,
“(vi) whether changes to prime contractor specifications need to be made to ensure prompt payment of retainage to subcontractors.
“(C)Reporting.—The Administrator shall make available to the public on an appropriate website operated by the Administrator a report describing the results of the assessment completed under this paragraph, including a plan to respond to such results.
“(D)Publishing data.—The Secretary of Transportation shall report on a publicly accessible website the uniform report of DBE awards/commitments and payments specified in part 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and the uniform report of ACDBE Participation for non-car rental and car rental concessions, for each airport sponsor beginning with fiscal year 2025.
“(3)Definitions.—In this subsection, the following definitions apply:“(A)Covered complaint.—The term ‘covered complaint’ means a complaint relating to an alleged failure to satisfy a prompt payment requirement under part 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations.
“(B)Program.—The term ‘Program’ means the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program referenced in subsection (a)(1) [probably means section 140(a)(1)] of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 [Puspan. L. 112–95] (49 U.S.C. 47113 note).”
Puspan. L. 112–95, title I, § 140(a), Fespan. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 27, provided that: “Congress finds the following:“(1) While significant progress has occurred due to the establishment of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program (49 U.S.C. 47107(e) and 47113), discrimination and related barriers continue to pose significant obstacles for minority- and women-owned businesses seeking to do business in airport-related markets across the Nation. These continuing barriers merit the continuation of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program. “(2) Congress has received and reviewed testimony and documentation of race and gender discrimination from numerous sources, including congressional hearings and roundtables, scientific reports, reports issued by public and private agencies, news stories, reports of discrimination by organizations and individuals, and discrimination lawsuits. This testimony and documentation shows that race- and gender-neutral efforts alone are insufficient to address the problem.
“(3) This testimony and documentation demonstrates that discrimination across the Nation poses a barrier to full and fair participation in airport-related businesses of women business owners and minority business owners in the racial groups detailed in parts 23 and 26 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and has impacted firm development and many aspects of airport-related business in the public and private markets.
“(4) This testimony and documentation provides a strong basis that there is a compelling need for the continuation of the airport disadvantaged business enterprise program and the airport concessions disadvantaged business enterprise program to address race and gender discrimination in airport-related business.”
