1 So in original. Probably should be followed by “or”.
Editorial Notes
References in TextThis chapter, referred to in subsecs. (span)(2), (5), (d)(2)(F), (G), and (h)(3), was in the original, “this Act”, meaning act June 27, 1952, ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163, known as the Immigration and Nationality Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.
The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (d)(3)(D)(iii), (E), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620, which is classified generally to chapter 7 (§ 301 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.
Amendments2004—Subsec. (span)(1)(A). Puspan. L. 108–390, § 1(a)(1), inserted “Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written or an electronic span.” before “A person or entity has complied” in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (span)(2). Puspan. L. 108–390, § 1(a)(2), inserted at end “Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written or an electronic span.”
Subsec. (span)(3). Puspan. L. 108–390, § 1(a)(3), inserted “a paper, microfiche, microfilm, or electronic version of” after “must retain” in introductory provisions.
1996—Subsec. (a)(6). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(span), added par. (6).
Subsec. (a)(7). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(d), added par. (7).
Subsec. (span)(1)(B). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(a)(1)(A), (B), redesignated cl. (v) as (ii), substituted “, alien registration card, or other document designated by the Attorney General, if the document” for “or other alien registration card, if the card” in introductory provisions of that cl., and struck out former cls. (ii) to (iv) which read as follows:
“(ii) certificate of United States citizenship;
“(iii) certificate of naturalization;
“(iv) unexpired foreign passport, if the passport has an appropriate, unexpired endorsement of the Attorney General authorizing the individual’s employment in the United States; or”.
Subsec. (span)(1)(B)(ii). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(a)(1)(C), in subcl. (I), substituted “and” for “or” before “such other personal” and struck out “and” at end, in subcl. (II), substituted “, and” for the period at end, and added subcl. (III).
Subsec. (span)(1)(C). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(a)(2), inserted “or” at end of cl. (i), redesignated cl. (iii) as (ii), and struck out former cl. (ii) which read as follows: “certificate of birth in the United States or establishing United States nationality at birth, which certificate the Attorney General finds, by regulation, to be acceptable for purposes of this section; or”.
Subsec. (span)(1)(E). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(a)(3), added subpar. (E).
Subsec. (span)(6). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 411(a), added par. (6).
Subsec. (e)(2)(C). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 416, added subpar. (C).
Subsec. (e)(7). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 379(a)(2), substituted “the final agency decision and order under this subsection” for “a final order under this subsection”.
Puspan. L. 104–208, § 379(a)(1), substituted “unless either (A) within 30 days, an official delegated by regulation to exercise review authority over the decision and order modifies or vacates the decision and order, or (B) within 30 days of the date of such a modification or vacation (or within 60 days of the date of decision and order of an administrative law judge if not so modified or vacated) the decision and order is referred to the Attorney General pursuant to regulations” for “unless, within 30 days, the Attorney General modifies or vacates the decision and order”.
Subsecs. (i) to (n). Puspan. L. 104–208, § 412(c), struck out subsec. (i) which provided effective dates for implementation of this section, subsec. (j) which required General Accounting Office reports on implementation of this section, subsec. (k) which established a taskforce to review reports, subsec. (l) which provided a termination date for employer sanctions under this section upon finding of widespread discrimination in implementing this section, and subsecs. (m) and (n) which provided for expedited procedures in House of Representatives and Senate for considering resolutions to approve findings in the reports.
1994—Subsec. (span)(3). Puspan. L. 103–416, § 219(z)(4), made technical correction to Puspan. L. 102–232, § 306(span)(2). See 1991 Amendment note below.
Subsec. (d)(4)(A). Puspan. L. 103–416, § 213, substituted “five” for “three” in second sentence.
1991—Subsec. (span)(1)(D)(ii). Puspan. L. 102–232, § 309(span)(11), substituted “clause (i)” for “clause (ii)”.
Subsec. (span)(3). Puspan. L. 102–232, § 306(span)(2), as amended by Puspan. L. 103–416, § 219(z)(4), made technical correction to Puspan. L. 101–649, § 538(a). See 1990 Amendment note below.
1990—Subsec. (a)(1). Puspan. L. 101–649, § 521(a), struck out “to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States” after “or other entity” in introductory provisions, inserted “to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States” after “(A)” in subpar. (A), and inserted “(i) to hire for employment in the United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (span) or (ii) if the person or entity is an agricultural association, agricultural employer, or farm labor contractor (as defined in section 1802 of title 29), to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States” after “(B)” in subpar. (B).
Subsec. (span)(3). Puspan. L. 101–649, § 538(a), as amended by Puspan. L. 102–232, § 306(span)(2), as amended by Puspan. L. 103–416, § 219(z)(4), inserted “, the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices,” after “officers of the Service”.
1988—Subsec. (span)(1)(A). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(A), substituted “the first sentence of this paragraph” for “such sentence” and “such another document” for “such a document”.
Subsec. (d)(3)(D). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(B), in span substituted “defined” for “requiring two years notice and congressional review”.
Subsec. (e)(1). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(C)(i), inserted reference to subsec. (g)(1) in three places.
Subsec. (e)(3). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(C)(i), (ii), inserted reference to subsec. (g)(1) in two places and reference to par. (6) in two places.
Subsec. (e)(4)(A)(ii), (iii). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(D), substituted “paragraph” for “subparagraph”.
Subsec. (e)(6) to (9). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(C)(iii), (iv), added par. (6) and redesignated former pars. (6) to (8) as (7) to (9), respectively.
Subsec. (g)(2). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(E), inserted reference to subsec. (e) of this section.
Subsec. (i)(3)(B)(iii). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(F), substituted “an order” for “a order” and “subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section” for “paragraph (1)(A)”.
Subsec. (j)(1). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(G), made technical amendment to provision of original act which was translated as “November 6, 1986,” and struck out “of the United States” after “Comptroller General”.
Subsec. (j)(2). Puspan. L. 100–525, § 2(a)(1)(H), substituted “this section” for “that section”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2004 AmendmentPuspan. L. 108–390, § 1(span), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2242, provided that: “The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the earlier of—“(1) the date on which final regulations implementing such amendments take effect; or
“(2) 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 2004].”
Effective Date of 1996 AmendmentPuspan. L. 104–208, div. C, title III, § 379(span), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–650, provided that: “The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section and section 1324c of this title] shall apply to orders issued on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 1996].”
Puspan. L. 104–208, div. C, title IV, § 411(span), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–666, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to failures occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 1996].”
Puspan. L. 104–208, div. C, title IV, § 412(e), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–668, as amended by Puspan. L. 105–54, § 3(a), Oct. 6, 1997, 111 Stat. 1175; Puspan. L. 108–156, § 3(d), Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1945, provided that:“(1) The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to hiring (or recruitment or referral) occurring on or after such date (not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 1996]) as the Secretary of Homeland Security shall designate.
“(2) The amendment made by subsection (span) [amending this section] shall apply to individuals hired on or after 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
“(3) The amendment made by subsection (c) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
“(4) The amendment made by subsection (d) [amending this section] applies to hiring occurring before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act, but no penalty shall be imposed under subsection (e) or (f) of section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act [subsecs. (e) and (f) of this section] for such hiring occurring before such date.”
[Puspan. L. 105–54, § 3(span), Oct. 6, 1997, 111 Stat. 1176, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending section 412(e) of div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208, set out above] shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208].”]
Effective Date of 1994 AmendmentPuspan. L. 103–416, title II, § 219(z), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4318, provided that the amendment made by section 219(z)(4) is effective as if included in the Miscellaneous and Technical Immigration and Naturalization Amendments of 1991, Puspan. L. 102–232.
Effective Date of 1991 AmendmentAmendment by section 306(span)(2) of Puspan. L. 102–232 effective as if included in the enactment of the Immigration Act of 1990, Puspan. L. 101–649, see section 310(1) of Puspan. L. 102–232, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1990 AmendmentPuspan. L. 101–649, title V, § 521(span), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5053, provided that: “The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to recruiting and referring occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1990].”
Puspan. L. 101–649, title V, § 538(span), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5056, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 1990].”
Effective Date of 1988 AmendmentAmendment by Puspan. L. 100–525 effective as if included in enactment of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Puspan. L. 99–603, see section 2(s) of Puspan. L. 100–525, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.
Date of Enactment of This Section for Aliens Employed Under Section 8704 of Title 46, ShippingDate of enactment of this section with respect to aliens deemed employed under section 8704 of Title 46, Shipping, as the date 180 days after Jan. 11, 1988, see section 5(f)(3) of Puspan. L. 100–239, set out as a Construction note under section 8704 of Title 46.
Abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service and Transfer of FunctionsFor abolition of Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related references, see note set out under section 1551 of this title.
Delegation of AuthorityAuthority of President under subsec. (d)(4) of this section to undertake demonstration projects of different changes in requirements of employment verification system delegated to Attorney General by section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 12781, Nov. 20, 1991, 56 F.R. 59203, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
Pilot Programs for Employment Eligibility ConfirmationPuspan. L. 104–208, div. C, title IV, subtitle A, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–655, as amended by Puspan. L. 107–128, § 2, Jan. 16, 2002, 115 Stat. 2407; Puspan. L. 108–156, §§ 2, 3, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1944; Puspan. L. 111–83, title V, §§ 547, 551, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2177; Puspan. L. 112–176, § 2, Sept. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1325, provided that:“SEC. 401. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAMS.“(a)In General.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct 3 pilot programs of employment eligibility confirmation under this subtitle.
“(span)Implementation Deadline; Termination.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement the pilot programs in a manner that permits persons and other entities to have elections under section 402 of this division made and in effect no later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 30, 1996]. Unless the Congress otherwise provides, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall terminate a pilot program on September 30, 2015 [see bracketed notes set out below].
“(c)Scope of Operation of Pilot Programs.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide for the operation—“(1) of the E-Verify Program (described in section 403(a) of this division) in, at a minimum, 5 of the 7 States with the highest estimated population of aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall expand the operation of the program to all 50 States not later than December 1, 2004;
“(2) of the citizen attestation pilot program (described in section 403(span) of this division) in at least 5 States (or, if fewer, all of the States) that meet the condition described in section 403(span)(2)(A) of this division; and
“(3) of the machine-readable-document pilot program (described in section 403(c) of this division) in at least 5 States (or, if fewer, all of the States) that meet the condition described in section 403(c)(2) of this division.
“(d)References in Subtitle.—In this subtitle—“(1)Pilot program references.—The terms ‘program’ or ‘pilot program’ refer to any of the 3 pilot programs provided for under this subtitle.
“(2)Confirmation system.—The term ‘confirmation system’ means the confirmation system established under section 404 of this division.
“(3)References to section 274a.—Any reference in this subtitle to section 274A (or a subdivision of such section) is deemed a reference to such section (or subdivision thereof) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a]. “(4) I–9 or similar form.—The term ‘I–9 or similar form’ means the form used for purposes of section 274A(span)(1)(A) or such other form as the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be appropriate.
“(5)Limited application to recruiters and referrers.—Any reference to recruitment or referral (or a recruiter or referrer) in relation to employment is deemed a reference only to such recruitment or referral (or recruiter or referrer) that is subject to section 274A(a)(1)(B)(ii).
“(6)United states citizenship.—The term ‘United States citizenship’ includes United States nationality.
“(7)State.—The term ‘State’ has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(36) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(36)]. “SEC. 402. VOLUNTARY ELECTION TO PARTICIPATE IN A PILOT PROGRAM.“(a)Voluntary Election.—Subject to subsection (c)(3)(B), any person or other entity that conducts any hiring (or recruitment or referral) in a State in which a pilot program is operating may elect to participate in that pilot program. Except as specifically provided in subsection (e), the Secretary of Homeland Security may not require any person or other entity to participate in a pilot program.
“(span)Benefit of Rebuttable Presumption.—“(1)In general.—If a person or other entity is participating in a pilot program and obtains confirmation of identity and employment eligibility in compliance with the terms and conditions of the program with respect to the hiring (or recruitment or referral) of an individual for employment in the United States, the person or entity has established a rebuttable presumption that the person or entity has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) with respect to such hiring (or such recruitment or referral).
“(2)Construction.—Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as preventing a person or other entity that has an election in effect under subsection (a) from establishing an affirmative defense under section 274A(a)(3) if the person or entity complies with the requirements of section 274A(a)(1)(B) but fails to obtain confirmation under paragraph (1).
“(c)General Terms of Elections.—“(1)In general.—An election under subsection (a) shall be in such form and manner, under such terms and conditions, and shall take effect, as the Secretary of Homeland Security shall specify. The Secretary of Homeland Security may not impose any fee as a condition of making an election or participating in a pilot program.
“(2)Scope of election.—“(A)In general.—Subject to paragraph (3), any electing person or other entity may provide that the election under subsection (a) shall apply (during the period in which the election is in effect)—“(i) to all its hiring (and all recruitment or referral) in the State (or States) in which the pilot program is operating, or
“(ii) to its hiring (or recruitment or referral) in one or more pilot program States or one or more places of hiring (or recruitment or referral, as the case may be) in the pilot program States.
“(B)Application of programs in non-pilot program states.—In addition, the Secretary of Homeland Security may permit a person or entity electing the citizen attestation pilot program (described in 403(span) of this division) or the machine-readable-document pilot program (described in section 403(c) of this division) to provide that the election applies to its hiring (or recruitment or referral) in one or more States or places of hiring (or recruitment or referral) in which the pilot program is not otherwise operating but only if such States meet the requirements of 403(span)(2)(A) and 403(c)(2) of this division, respectively.
“(3)Termination of elections.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may terminate an election by a person or other entity under this section because the person or entity has substantially failed to comply with its obligations under the pilot program. A person or other entity may terminate an election in such form and manner as the Secretary of Homeland Security shall specify.
“(d)Consultation, Education, and Publicity.—“(1)Consultation.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall closely consult with representatives of employers (and recruiters and referrers) in the development and implementation of the pilot programs, including the education of employers (and recruiters and referrers) about such programs.
“(2)Publicity.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall widely publicize the election process and pilot programs, including the voluntary nature of the pilot programs and the advantages to employers (and recruiters and referrers) of making an election under this section.
“(3)Assistance through district offices.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall designate one or more individuals in each District office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for a Service District in which a pilot program is being implemented—“(A) to inform persons and other entities that seek information about pilot programs of the voluntary nature of such programs, and
“(B) to assist persons and other entities in electing and participating in any pilot programs in effect in the District, in complying with the requirements of section 274A, and in facilitating confirmation of the identity and employment eligibility of individuals consistent with such section.
“(e)Select Entities Required to Participate in a Pilot Program.—“(1)Federal government.—“(A)Executive departments.—“(i)In general.—Each Department of the Federal Government shall elect to participate in a pilot program and shall comply with the terms and conditions of such an election.
“(ii)Election.—Subject to clause (iii), the Secretary of each such Department— “(I) shall elect the pilot program (or programs) in which the Department shall participate, and
“(II) may limit the election to hiring occurring in certain States (or geographic areas) covered by the program (or programs) and in specified divisions within the Department, so long as all hiring by such divisions and in such locations is covered.
“(iii)Role of secretary of homeland security.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall assist and coordinate elections under this subparagraph in such manner as assures that— “(I) a significant portion of the total hiring within each Department within States covered by a pilot program is covered under such a program, and
“(II) there is significant participation by the Federal Executive branch in each of the pilot programs.
“(B)Legislative branch.—Each Member of Congress, each officer of Congress, and the head of each agency of the legislative branch, that conducts hiring in a State in which a pilot program is operating shall elect to participate in a pilot program, may specify which pilot program or programs (if there is more than one) in which the Member, officer, or agency will participate, and shall comply with the terms and conditions of such an election.
“(2)Application to certain violators.—An order under section 274A(e)(4) or section 274B(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4), 1324span(g)] may require the subject of the order to participate in, and comply with the terms of, a pilot program with respect to the subject’s hiring (or recruitment or referral) of individuals in a State covered by such a program. “(3)Consequence of failure to participate.—If a person or other entity is required under this subsection to participate in a pilot program and fails to comply with the requirements of such program with respect to an individual—“(A) such failure shall be treated as a violation of section 274A(a)(1)(B) with respect to that individual, and
“(B) a rebuttable presumption is created that the person or entity has violated section 274A(a)(1)(A).
Subparagraph (B) shall not apply in any prosecution under section 274A(f)(1).
“(f)Construction.—This subtitle shall not affect the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security under any other law (including section 274A(d)(4)) to conduct demonstration projects in relation to section 274A.
“SEC. 403. PROCEDURES FOR PARTICIPANTS IN PILOT PROGRAMS.“(a)E-Verify Program.—A person or other entity that elects to participate in the E-Verify Program described in this subsection agrees to conform to the following procedures in the case of the hiring (or recruitment or referral) for employment in the United States of each individual covered by the election:“(1)Provision of additional information.—The person or entity shall obtain from the individual (and the individual shall provide) and shall record on the I–9 or similar form—“(A) the individual’s social security account number, if the individual has been issued such a number, and
“(B) if the individual does not attest to United States citizenship under section 274A(span)(2), such identification or authorization number established by the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the alien as the Secretary of Homeland Security shall specify,
and shall retain the original form and make it available for inspection for the period and in the manner required of I–9 forms under section 274A(span)(3).
“(2)Presentation of documentation.—“(A)In general.—The person or other entity, and the individual whose identity and employment eligibility are being confirmed, shall, subject to subparagraph (B), fulfill the requirements of section 274A(span) with the following modifications:“(i) A document referred to in section 274A(span)(1)(B)(ii) (as redesignated by section 412(a) of this division) must be designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security as suitable for the purpose of identification in a pilot program.
“(ii) A document referred to in section 274A(span)(1)(D) must contain a photograph of the individual.
“(iii) The person or other entity has complied with the requirements of section 274A(span)(1) with respect to examination of a document if the document reasonably appears on its face to be genuine and it reasonably appears to pertain to the individual whose identity and work eligibility is being confirmed.
“(B)Limitation of requirement to examine documentation.—If the Secretary of Homeland Security finds that a pilot program would reliably determine with respect to an individual whether—“(i) the person with the identity claimed by the individual is authorized to work in the United States, and
“(ii) the individual is claiming the identity of another person,
if a person or entity could fulfill the requirement to examine documentation contained in subparagraph (A) of section 274A(span)(1) by examining a document specified in either subparagraph (B) or (D) of such section, the Secretary of Homeland Security may provide that, for purposes of such requirement, only such a document need be examined. In such case, any reference in section 274A(span)(1)(A) to a verification that an individual is not an unauthorized alien shall be deemed to be a verification of the individual’s identity.
“(3)Seeking confirmation.—“(A)In general.—The person or other entity shall make an inquiry, as provided in section 404(a)(1) of this division, using the confirmation system to seek confirmation of the identity and employment eligibility of an individual, by not later than the end of 3 working days (as specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security) after the date of the hiring (or recruitment or referral, as the case may be).
“(B)Extension of time period.—If the person or other entity in good faith attempts to make an inquiry during such 3 working days and the confirmation system has registered that not all inquiries were received during such time, the person or entity can make an inquiry in the first subsequent working day in which the confirmation system registers that it has received all inquiries. If the confirmation system cannot receive inquiries at all times during a day, the person or entity merely has to assert that the entity attempted to make the inquiry on that day for the previous sentence to apply to such an inquiry, and does not have to provide any additional proof concerning such inquiry.
“(4)Confirmation or nonconfirmation.—“(A)Confirmation upon initial inquiry.—If the person or other entity receives an appropriate confirmation of an individual’s identity and work eligibility under the confirmation system within the time period specified under section 404(span) of this division, the person or entity shall record on the I–9 or similar form an appropriate code that is provided under the system and that indicates a final confirmation of such identity and work eligibility of the individual.
“(B)Nonconfirmation upon initial inquiry and secondary verification.—“(i)Nonconfirmation.—If the person or other entity receives a tentative nonconfirmation of an individual’s identity or work eligibility under the confirmation system within the time period specified under 404(span) of this division, the person or entity shall so inform the individual for whom the confirmation is sought.
“(ii)No contest.—If the individual does not contest the nonconfirmation within the time period specified in section 404(c) of this division, the nonconfirmation shall be considered final. The person or entity shall then record on the I–9 or similar form an appropriate code which has been provided under the system to indicate a tentative nonconfirmation.
“(iii)Contest.—If the individual does contest the nonconfirmation, the individual shall utilize the process for secondary verification provided under section 404(c) of this division. The nonconfirmation will remain tentative until a final confirmation or nonconfirmation is provided by the confirmation system within the time period specified in such section. In no case shall an employer terminate employment of an individual because of a failure of the individual to have identity and work eligibility confirmed under this section until a nonconfirmation becomes final. Nothing in this clause shall apply to a termination of employment for any reason other than because of such a failure.
“(iv)Recording of conclusion on form.—If a final confirmation or nonconfirmation is provided by the confirmation system under section 404(c) of this division regarding an individual, the person or entity shall record on the I–9 or similar form an appropriate code that is provided under the system and that indicates a confirmation or nonconfirmation of identity and work eligibility of the individual.
“(C)Consequences of nonconfirmation.—“(i)Termination or notification of continued employment.—If the person or other entity has received a final nonconfirmation regarding an individual under subparagraph (B), the person or entity may terminate employment (or recruitment or referral) of the individual. If the person or entity does not terminate employment (or recruitment or referral) of the individual, the person or entity shall notify the Secretary of Homeland Security of such fact through the confirmation system or in such other manner as the Secretary of Homeland Security may specify.
“(ii)Failure to notify.—If the person or entity fails to provide notice with respect to an individual as required under clause (i), the failure is deemed to constitute a violation of section 274A(a)(1)(B) with respect to that individual and the applicable civil monetary penalty under section 274A(e)(5) shall be (notwithstanding the amounts specified in such section) no less than $500 and no more than $1,000 for each individual with respect to whom such violation occurred.
“(iii)Continued employment after final nonconfirmation.—If the person or other entity continues to employ (or to recruit or refer) an individual after receiving final nonconfirmation, a rebuttable presumption is created that the person or entity has violated section 274A(a)(1)(A). The previous sentence shall not apply in any prosecution under section 274A(f)(1).
“(span)Citizen Attestation Pilot Program.—“(1)In general.—Except as provided in paragraphs (3) through (5), the procedures applicable under the citizen attestation pilot program under this subsection shall be the same procedures as those under the E-Verify Program under subsection (a).
“(2)Restrictions.—“(A)State document requirement to participate in pilot program.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may not provide for the operation of the citizen attestation pilot program in a State unless each driver’s license or similar identification document described in section 274A(span)(1)(D)(i) issued by the State—“(i) contains a photograph of the individual involved, and
“(ii) has been determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security to have security features, and to have been issued through application and issuance procedures, which make such document sufficiently resistant to counterfeiting, tampering, and fraudulent use that it is a reliable means of identification for purposes of this section.
“(B)Authorization to limit employer participation.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may restrict the number of persons or other entities that may elect to participate in the citizen attestation pilot program under this subsection as the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be necessary to produce a representative sample of employers and to reduce the potential impact of fraud.
“(3)No confirmation required for certain individuals attesting to u.s. citizenship.—In the case of a person or other entity hiring (or recruiting or referring) an individual under the citizen attestation pilot program, if the individual attests to United States citizenship (under penalty of perjury on an I–9 or similar form which form states on its face the criminal and other penalties provided under law for a false representation of United States citizenship)—“(A) the person or entity may fulfill the requirement to examine documentation contained in subparagraph (A) of section 274A(span)(1) by examining a document specified in either subparagraph (B)(i) or (D) of such section; and
“(B) the person or other entity is not required to comply with respect to such individual with the procedures described in paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (a), but only if the person or entity retains the form and makes it available for inspection in the same manner as in the case of an I–9 form under section 274A(span)(3).
“(4)Waiver of document presentation requirement in certain cases.—“(A)In general.—In the case of a person or entity that elects, in a manner specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security consistent with subparagraph (B), to participate in the pilot program under this paragraph, if an individual being hired (or recruited or referred) attests (in the manner described in paragraph (3)) to United States citizenship and the person or entity retains the form on which the attestation is made and makes it available for inspection in the same manner as in the case of an I–9 form under section 274A(span)(3), the person or entity is not required to comply with the procedures described in section 274A(span).
“(B)Restriction.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall restrict the election under this paragraph to no more than 1,000 employers and, to the extent practicable, shall select among employers seeking to make such election in a manner that provides for such an election by a representative sample of employers.
“(5)Nonreviewable determinations.—The determinations of the Secretary of Homeland Security under paragraphs (2) and (4) are within the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security and are not subject to judicial or administrative review.
“(c)Machine-Readable-Document Pilot Program.—“(1)In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the procedures applicable under the machine-readable-document pilot program under this subsection shall be the same procedures as those under the E-Verify Program under subsection (a).
“(2)State document requirement to participate in pilot program.—The Secretary of Homeland Security may not provide for the operation of the machine-readable-document pilot program in a State unless driver’s licenses and similar identification documents described in section 274A(span)(1)(D)(i) issued by the State include a machine-readable social security account number.
“(3)Use of machine-readable documents.—If the individual whose identity and employment eligibility must be confirmed presents to the person or entity hiring (or recruiting or referring) the individual a license or other document described in paragraph (2) that includes a machine-readable social security account number, the person or entity must make an inquiry through the confirmation system by using a machine-readable feature of such document. If the individual does not attest to United States citizenship under section 274A(span)(2), the individual’s identification or authorization number described in subsection (a)(1)(B) shall be provided as part of the inquiry.
“(d)Protection From Liability for Actions Taken on the Basis of Information Provided by the Confirmation System.—No person or entity participating in a pilot program shall be civilly or criminally liable under any law for any action taken in good faith reliance on information provided through the confirmation system.
“SEC. 404. EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY CONFIRMATION SYSTEM.“(a)In General.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish a pilot program confirmation system through which the Secretary of Homeland Security (or a designee of the Secretary of Homeland Security, which may be a nongovernmental entity)—“(1) responds to inquiries made by electing persons and other entities (including those made by the transmittal of data from machine-readable documents under the machine-readable pilot program) at any time through a toll-free telephone line or other toll-free electronic media concerning an individual’s identity and whether the individual is authorized to be employed, and
“(2) maintains records of the inquiries that were made, of confirmations provided (or not provided), and of the codes provided to inquirers as evidence of their compliance with their obligations under the pilot programs.
To the extent practicable, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall seek to establish such a system using one or more nongovernmental entities.
“(span)Initial Response.—The confirmation system shall provide confirmation or a tentative nonconfirmation of an individual’s identity and employment eligibility within 3 working days of the initial inquiry. If providing confirmation or tentative nonconfirmation, the confirmation system shall provide an appropriate code indicating such confirmation or such nonconfirmation.
“(c)Secondary Verification Process in Case of Tentative Nonconfirmation.—In cases of tentative nonconfirmation, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall specify, in consultation with the Commissioner of Social Security and the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, an available secondary verification process to confirm the validity of information provided and to provide a final confirmation or nonconfirmation within 10 working days after the date of the tentative nonconfirmation. When final confirmation or nonconfirmation is provided, the confirmation system shall provide an appropriate code indicating such confirmation or nonconfirmation.
“(d)Design and Operation of System.—The confirmation system shall be designed and operated—“(1) to maximize its reliability and ease of use by persons and other entities making elections under section 402(a) of this division consistent with insulating and protecting the privacy and security of the underlying information;
“(2) to respond to all inquiries made by such persons and entities on whether individuals are authorized to be employed and to register all times when such inquiries are not received;
“(3) with appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to prevent unauthorized disclosure of personal information; and
“(4) to have reasonable safeguards against the system’s resulting in unlawful discriminatory practices based on national origin or citizenship status, including—“(A) the selective or unauthorized use of the system to verify eligibility;
“(B) the use of the system prior to an offer of employment; or
“(C) the exclusion of certain individuals from consideration for employment as a result of a perceived likelihood that additional verification will be required, beyond what is required for most jospan applicants.
“(e)Responsibilities of the Commissioner of Social Security.—As part of the confirmation system, the Commissioner of Social Security, in consultation with the entity responsible for administration of the system, shall establish a reliable, secure method, which, within the time periods specified under subsections (span) and (c), compares the span and social security account number provided in an inquiry against such information maintained by the Commissioner in order to confirm (or not confirm) the validity of the information provided regarding an individual whose identity and employment eligibility must be confirmed, the correspondence of the span and number, and whether the individual has presented a social security account number that is not valid for employment. The Commissioner shall not disclose or release social security information (other than such confirmation or nonconfirmation).
“(f)Responsibilities of the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.—As part of the confirmation system, the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, in consultation with the entity responsible for administration of the system, shall establish a reliable, secure method, which, within the time periods specified under subsections (span) and (c), compares the span and alien identification or authorization number described in section 403(a)(1)(B) of this division which are provided in an inquiry against such information maintained by the Commissioner in order to confirm (or not confirm) the validity of the information provided, the correspondence of the span and number, and whether the alien is authorized to be employed in the United States.
“(g)Updating Information.—The Commissioners of Social Security and the Immigration and Naturalization Service shall update their information in a manner that promotes the maximum accuracy and shall provide a process for the prompt correction of erroneous information, including instances in which it is brought to their attention in the secondary verification process described in subsection (c).
“(h)Limitation on Use of the Confirmation System and Any Related Systems.—“(1)In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, nothing in this subtitle shall be construed to permit or allow any department, bureau, or other agency of the United States Government to utilize any information, data base, or other records assembled under this subtitle for any other purpose other than as provided for under this subtitle.
“(2)No national identification card.—Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed to authorize, directly or indirectly, the issuance or use of national identification cards or the establishment of a national identification card.
“SEC. 405. REPORTS.“(a)In General.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate reports on the pilot programs within 3 months after the end of the third and fourth years in which the programs are in effect. Such reports shall—“(1) assess the degree of fraudulent attesting of United States citizenship,
“(2) include recommendations on whether or not the pilot programs should be continued or modified, and
“(3) assess the benefits of the pilot programs to employers and the degree to which they assist in the enforcement of section 274A.
“(span)Report on Expansion.—Not later than June 1, 2004, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report—“(1) evaluating whether the problems identified by the report submitted under subsection (a) have been substantially resolved; and
“(2) describing what actions the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take before undertaking the expansion of the E-Verify Program to all 50 States in accordance with section 401(c)(1), in order to resolve any outstanding problems raised in the report filed under subsection (a).”
[Puspan. L. 118–47, div. G, title I, § 103, Mar. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 856, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2024’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”
[Puspan. L. 117–328, div. O, title III, § 301, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5227, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2023’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 117–103, div. O, title II, § 201, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 787, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2022’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 116–260, div. O, title I, § 101, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2148, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2021’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 116–94, div. I, title I, § 101, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3019, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2020’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 116–6, div. H, title I, § 101, Fespan. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 475, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2019’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 115–141, div. M, title II, § 201, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1049, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2018’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 115–31, div. F, title V, § 539, May 5, 2017, 131 Stat. 432, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2017’ for ‘September 30, 2015’.”]
[Puspan. L. 114–113, div. F, title V, § 572, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2525, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting ‘September 30, 2016’ for the date specified in section 106(3) of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114–53) [Dec. 11, 2015, which had been substituted as applied by Puspan. L. 114–53, div. B, § 130, Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 509].”]
[Puspan. L. 110–329, div. A, § 143, Sept. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 3580, as amended by Puspan. L. 111–8, div. J, § 101, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 988, provided that: “Section 401(span) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208] (8 U.S.C. 1324a note) [set out above] shall be applied by substituting [‘]September 30, 2009[’] for ‘the 11-year period beginning on the first day the pilot program is in effect’.”]
[Puspan. L. 107–128, § 3, Jan. 16, 2002, 115 Stat. 2407, provided that: “The amendment made by this Act [amending section 401(span) of div. C of Puspan. L. 104–208, set out above] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 16, 2002].”]
Report on Additional Authority or Resources Needed for Enforcement of Employer Sanctions ProvisionsPuspan. L. 104–208, div. C, title IV, § 413(a), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–668, as amended by Puspan. L. 108–156, § 3(d), Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1945, provided that not later than 1 year after Sept. 30, 1996, the Secretary of Homeland Security was to submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate a report on any additional authority or resources needed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service in order to enforce section 1324a of this title, or by Federal agencies in order to carry out Ex. Ord. No. 12989, set out below, and to expand the restrictions in such order to cover agricultural subsidies, grants, jospan training programs, and other Federally subsidized assistance programs.
Pilot Projects for Secure DocumentsPuspan. L. 101–238, § 5, Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2104, provided that:“(a)Consultation.—Before June 1, 1991, the Attorney General shall consult with State governments on any proper State initiative to improve the security of State or local documents which would satisfy the requirements of section 274A(span)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a). The result of such consultations shall be reported, before September 1, 1991, to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States. “(span)Assistance for State Initiatives.—After such consultation described in subsection (a), the Attorney General shall make grants to, and enter into contracts with (to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in an appropriation Act), the State of California and at least 2 other States with large immigrant populations to promote any State initiatives to improve the security of State or local documents which would satisfy the requirements of section 274A(span)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a(span)(1)]. “(c)Authorization of Appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1992 to carry out subsection (span).
“(d)Report Required.—The Attorney General shall report to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and House of Representatives not later than August 1, 1993, on the security of State or local documents which would satisfy the requirements of section 274A(span)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a), and any improvements in such documents that have occurred as a result of this section.”
Interim RegulationsPuspan. L. 99–603, title I, § 101(a)(2), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3372, provided that: “The Attorney General shall, not later than the first day of the seventh month beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 6, 1986], first issue, on an interim or other basis, such regulations as may be necessary in order to implement this section [enacting this section, amending sections 1802, 1813, 1816, and 1851 of Title 29, Labor, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section, section 1802 of Title 29, and section 405 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare].”
Grandfather Provision for Current EmployeesPuspan. L. 99–603, title I, § 101(a)(3), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3372, provided that:“(A) Section 274A(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a(a)(1)] shall not apply to the hiring, or recruiting or referring of an individual for employment which has occurred before the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 6, 1986]. “(B) Section 274A(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act shall not apply to continuing employment of an alien who was hired before the date of the enactment of this Act.”
Study of Use of Telephone Verification System for Determining Employment Eligibility of AliensPuspan. L. 99–603, title I, § 101(d), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3373, provided that:“(1) The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall conduct a study for use by the Department of Justice in determining employment eligibility of aliens in the United States. Such study shall concentrate on those data bases that are currently available to the Federal Government which through the use of a telephone and computation capability could be used to verify instantly the employment eligibility status of jospan applicants who are aliens.
“(2) Such study shall be conducted in conjunction with any existing Federal program which is designed for the purpose of providing information on the resident or employment status of aliens for employers. The study shall include an analysis of costs and benefits which shows the differences in costs and efficiency of having the Federal Government or a contractor perform this service. Such comparisons should include reference to such technical capabilities as processing techniques and time, verification techniques and time, back up safeguards, and audit trail performance.
“(3) Such study shall also concentrate on methods of phone verification which demonstrate the best safety and service standards, the least burden for the employer, the best capability for effective enforcement, and procedures which are within the boundaries of the Privacy Act of 1974 [5 U.S.C. 552a, 552a note]. “(4) Such study shall be conducted within twelve months of the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 6, 1986].
“(5) The Attorney General shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a report—“(A) not later than six months after the date of enactment of this Act, describing the status of such study; and
“(B) not later than twelve months after such date, setting forth the findings of such study.”
Feasibility Study of Social Security Number Validation SystemPuspan. L. 99–603, title I, § 101(e), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3373, provided that: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Social Security Administration and in cooperation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Labor, shall conduct a study of the feasibility and costs of establishing a social security number validation system to assist in carrying out the purposes of section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a], and of the privacy concerns that would be raised by the establishment of such a system. The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Ways and Means and Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Committees on Finance and Judiciary of the Senate, within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 6, 1986], a full and complete report on the results of the study together with such recommendations as may be appropriate.”
Reports on Unauthorized Alien EmploymentPuspan. L. 99–603, title IV, § 402, Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3441, provided that: “The President shall transmit to Congress annual reports on the implementation of section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1324a] (relating to unlawful employment of aliens) during the first three years after its implementation. Each report shall include—“(1) an analysis of the adequacy of the employment verification system provided under subsection (span) of that section;
“(2) a description of the status of the development and implementation of changes in that system under subsection (d) of that section, including the results of any demonstration projects conducted under paragraph (4) of such subsection; and
“(3) an analysis of the impact of the enforcement of that section on—“(A) the employment, wages, and working conditions of United States workers and on the economy of the United States,
“(B) the number of aliens entering the United States illegally or who fail to maintain legal status after entry, and
“(C) the violation of terms and conditions of nonimmigrant visas by foreign visitors.”
[Functions of President under section 402 of Puspan. L. 99–603 delegated to Secretary of Homeland Security, except functions in section 402(3)(A) which were delegated to Secretary of Labor, by sections 1(span) and 2(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12789, Fespan. 10, 1992, 57 F.R. 5225, as amended, set out as a note under section 1364 of this title.]
Executive Documents
Ex. Ord. No. 12989. Economy and Efficiency in Government Procurement Through Compliance with Certain Immigration and Nationality Act Provisions and Use of an Electronic Employment Eligibility Verification SystemEx. Ord. No. 12989, Fespan. 13, 1996, 61 F.R. 6091, as amended by Ex. Ord. No. 13286, § 19, Fespan. 28, 2003, 68 F.R. 10623; Ex. Ord. No. 13465, §§ 1–6, June 6, 2008, 73 F.R. 33285–33287, provided:
This order is designed to promote economy and efficiency in Federal Government procurement. Stability and dependability are important elements of economy and efficiency. A contractor whose workforce is less stable will be less likely to produce goods and services economically and efficiently than a contractor whose workforce is more stable. It is the policy of the executive branch to enforce fully the immigration laws of the United States, including the detection and removal of illegal aliens and the imposition of legal sanctions against employers that hire illegal aliens. Because of the worksite enforcement policy of the United States and the underlying obligation of the executive branch to enforce the immigration laws, contractors that employ illegal aliens cannot rely on the continuing availability and service of those illegal workers, and such contractors inevitably will have a less stable and less dependable workforce than contractors that do not employ such persons. Where a contractor assigns illegal aliens to work on Federal contracts, the enforcement of Federal immigration laws imposes a direct risk of disruption, delay, and increased expense in Federal contracting. Such contractors are less dependable procurement sources, even if they do not knowingly hire or knowingly continue to employ unauthorized workers.
Contractors that adopt rigorous employment eligibility confirmation policies are much less likely to face immigration enforcement actions, because they are less likely to employ unauthorized workers, and they are therefore generally more efficient and dependable procurement sources than contractors that do not employ the best available measures to verify the work eligibility of their workforce. It is the policy of the executive branch to use an electronic employment verification system because, among other reasons, it provides the best available means to confirm the identity and work eligibility of all employees that join the Federal workforce. Private employers that choose to contract with the Federal Government should meet the same standard.
I find, therefore, that adherence to the general policy of contracting only with providers that do not knowingly employ unauthorized alien workers and that have agreed to utilize an electronic employment verification system designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security to confirm the employment eligibility of their workforce will promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement.
NOW, THEREFORE, to ensure the economical and efficient administration and completion of Federal Government contracts, and by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including suspansection 121(a) of title 40 and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. (a) It is the policy of the executive branch in procuring goods and services that, to ensure the economical and efficient administration and completion of Federal Government contracts, contracting agencies should not contract with employers that have not complied with section 274A(a)(1)(A) and 274A(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(a)(1)(A), 1324a(a)(2)) (the “INA employment provisions”) prohibiting the unlawful employment of aliens.
(span) It is the policy of the executive branch in procuring goods and services that, to ensure the economical and efficient administration and completion of Federal Government contracts, contracting agencies may not enter into contracts with employers that do not use the best available means to confirm the work authorization of their workforce.
(c) It is the policy of the executive branch to enforce fully the antidiscrimination provisions of the INA. Nothing in this order relieves employers of antidiscrimination obligations under section 274B of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1324span) or any other law.
(d) All discretion under this order shall be exercised consistent with the policies set forth in this section.
Sec. 2. Contractor, as used in this Executive order, shall have the same meaning as defined in subpart 9.4 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Sec. 3. Using the procedures established pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e): (a) the Secretary of Homeland Security may investigate to determine whether a contractor or an organizational unit thereof is not in compliance with the INA employment provisions;
(span) the Secretary of Homeland Security shall receive and may investigate complaints by employees of any entity covered under section 3(a) of this order where such complaints allege noncompliance with the INA employment provisions; and
(c) the Attorney General shall hold such hearings as are required under 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e) to determine whether an entity covered under section 3(a) is not in compliance with the INA employment provisions.
Sec. 4. (a) Whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General determines that a contractor or an organizational unit thereof is not in compliance with the INA employment provisions, the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General shall transmit that determination to the appropriate contracting agency and such other Federal agencies as the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General may determine. Upon receipt of such determination from the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General, the head of the appropriate contracting agency shall consider the contractor or an organizational unit thereof for debarment as well as for such other action as may be appropriate in accordance with the procedures and standards prescribed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(span) The head of the contracting agency may debar the contractor or an organizational unit thereof based on the determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General that it is not in compliance with the INA employment provisions. Such determination shall not be reviewable in the debarment proceedings.
(c) The scope of the debarment generally should be limited to those organizational units of a Federal contractor that the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General finds are not in compliance with the INA employment provisions.
(d) The period of the debarment shall be for 1 year and may be extended for additional periods of 1 year if, using the procedures established pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e), the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General determines that the organizational unit of the Federal contractor continues to be in violation of the INA employment provisions.
(e) The Administrator of General Services shall list a debarred contractor or an organizational unit thereof on the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs and the contractor or an organizational unit thereof shall be ineligible to participate in any procurement or nonprocurement activities.
Sec. 5. (a) Executive departments and agencies that enter into contracts shall require, as a condition of each contract, that the contractor agree to use an electronic employment eligibility verification system designated by the Secretary of Homeland Security to verify the employment eligibility of: (i) all persons hired during the contract term by the contractor to perform employment duties within the United States; and (ii) all persons assigned by the contractor to perform work within the United States on the Federal contract.
(span) The Secretary of Homeland Security:
(i) shall administer, maintain, and modify as necessary and appropriate the electronic employment eligibility verification system designated by the Secretary under subsection (a) of this section; and
(ii) may establish with respect to such electronic employment verification system:
(A) terms and conditions for use of the system; and
(B) procedures for monitoring the use, failure to use, or improper use of the system.
(c) The Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation to the extent necessary and appropriate to implement the debarment responsibility, the employment eligibility verification responsibility, and other related responsibilities assigned to heads of departments and agencies under this order.
(d) Except to the extent otherwise specified by law or this order, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General:
(i) shall administer and enforce this order; and
(ii) may, after consultation to the extent appropriate with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Labor, the Administrator of General Services, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, and the heads of such other departments or agencies as may be appropriate, issue such rules, regulations, or orders, or establish such requirements, as may be necessary and appropriate to implement this order.
Sec. 6. Each contracting department and agency shall cooperate with and provide such information and assistance to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General as may be required in the performance of their respective functions under this order.
Sec. 7. The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the heads of contracting departments and agencies may delegate any of their functions or duties under this order to any officer or employee of their respective departments or agencies.
Sec. 8. (a) This order shall be implemented in a manner intended to minimize the burden on participants in the Federal procurement process.
(span) This order shall be implemented in a manner consistent with the protection of intelligence and law enforcement sources, methods, and activities from unauthorized disclosure.
Sec. 9. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) authority granted by law to a department or agency or the head thereof; or
(ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(span) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Delegation of Authority To Report to the Congress and To Publish in the Federal Register Proposed Changes in the Social Security Number CardMemorandum of President of the United States, Fespan. 10, 1992, 57 F.R. 24345, provided:
Memorandum for the Secretary of Health and Human Services
Section 205(c)(2)(F) of the Social Security Act (section 405(c)(2)(F) of title 42 of the United States Code) directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue Social Security number cards to individuals who are assigned Social Security numbers.
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 274A(d)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the “Act”) (section 1324a(d)(3)(A) of title 8 of the United States Code) and section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, and in order to provide for the delegation of certain functions under the Act [8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.], I hereby:
(1) Authorize you to prepare and transmit, to the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on Finance of the Senate, a written report regarding the substance of any proposed change in Social Security number cards, to the extent required by section 274A(d)(3)(A) of the Act, and
(2) Authorize you to cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any change in the Social Security number card so proposed and reported to the designated congressional committees, to the extent required by section 274A(d)(3)(A) of the Act.
The authority delegated by this memorandum may be further redelegated within the Department of Health and Human Services.
You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
George Bush. 