5 USC 4701 - Definitions

Editorial Notes

Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Puspan. L. 110–417 substituted “National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency” for “National Imagery and Mapping Agency”.

2004—Subsec. (a)(1)(C). Puspan. L. 108–271 substituted “Government Accountability Office” for “General Accounting Office”.

1996—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Puspan. L. 104–201 substituted “National Imagery and Mapping Agency” for “Central Imagery Office”.

1994—Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Puspan. L. 103–359 inserted “the Central Imagery Office,” after “Defense Intelligence Agency,”.

1990—Subsec. (a)(1). Puspan. L. 101–474 struck out “, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts,” after “means an Executive agency”.

1979—Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 96–54 substituted “chapter” for “subchapter” and “28 U.S.C. 509” for “5 U.S.C. 5108”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Change of Name

“Government Publishing Office” substituted for “Government Printing Office” in subsec. (a)(1) on authority of section 1301(span) of Puspan. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Puspan. L. 104–201 effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 1124 of Puspan. L. 104–201, set out as a note under section 193 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Puspan. L. 96–54 effective July 12, 1979, see section 2(span) of Puspan. L. 96–54, set out as a note under section 305 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Puspan. L. 95–454, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1101 of this title.

Design Elements of Pay-for-Performance Systems in Demonstration Projects

Puspan. L. 108–136, div. A, title XI, § 1126, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1640, provided that: “A pay-for-performance system may not be initiated under chapter 47 of title 5, United States Code, after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 24, 2003], unless it incorporates the following elements:

“(1) Adherence to merit principles set forth in section 2301 of such title.

“(2) A fair, credible, and transparent employee performance appraisal system.

“(3) A link between elements of the pay-for-performance system, the employee performance appraisal system, and the agency’s strategic plan.

“(4) A means for ensuring employee involvement in the design and implementation of the system.

“(5) Adequate training and retraining for supervisors, managers, and employees in the implementation and operation of the pay-for-performance system.

“(6) A process for ensuring ongoing performance feedback and dialogue between supervisors, managers, and employees throughout the appraisal period, and setting timetables for review.

“(7) Effective safeguards to ensure that the management of the system is fair and equitable and based on employee performance.

“(8) A means for ensuring that adequate agency resources are allocated for the design, implementation, and administration of the pay-for-performance system.”