Historical and Revision Notes |
---|
30127(a) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2502(a), 105 Stat. 2081. |
30127(span) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(a)(1) (1st sentence), (span), 105 Stat. 2084, 2085. |
30127(c) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(a)(2), 105 Stat. 2085. |
30127(d) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(a)(3), 105 Stat. 2085. |
30127(e) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(c), 105 Stat. 2086. |
30127(f) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(a)(1) (last sentence), (d), 105 Stat. 2085, 2086. |
30127(g) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(e), 105 Stat. 2086. |
30127(h) | 15:1392 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Puspan. L. 102–240, § 2508(f), 105 Stat. 2087. |
In subsection (a), the definitions are derived from section 2502(a) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240, 105 Stat. 2081) and are restated because those definitions apply to the source provisions being restated in this section.
In subsection (span)(1), before clause (A), the words “Notwithstanding any other provision of law or rule” and “(to the extent such Act is not in conflict with the provisions of this section)” are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The words “The amendment shall require” are substituted for “The amendment promulgated under subsection (a) shall establish the following schedule” for clarity. The words “manufactured on or after the dates specified in the applicable schedule established by subsection (span)”, “The amendment shall take effect”, and “Subject to the provisions of subsection (c)” are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The words “for both of the front outboard seating positions for each” are substituted for “for the front outboard designated seating positions of each” for clarity. In clause (B), the word “new” is omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement. The word “only” is substituted for “exclusively” for consistency in the revised title.
In subsection (span)(2), the words “after August 31, 1998” are substituted for “on and after such date” for clarity.
In subsection (c), before clause (1), the words “In amending Standard 208, the Secretary of Transportation shall require” are substituted for “The amendment to such Standard 208 shall also require” for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (e)(3), the words “Only an affected manufacturer may apply for an exemption” are added for clarity. The words “consolidate similar applications from different manufacturers” are substituted for “consolidate applications of a similar nature of 1 or more manufacturers” for clarity.
In subsection (f)(1), before clause (A), the words “by the Secretary or any other person, including any court” are omitted as surplus. In clause (A), the word “affecting” is substituted for “altering or affecting” to eliminate an unnecessary word.
In subsection (f)(2), the words “by any person or court” are omitted as unnecessary. The word “affect” is substituted for “affect, change, or modify” to eliminate unnecessary words.
In subsection (g)(1), before clause (A), the words “and every 6 months after that date through” are substituted for “biannually . . . and continuing to” for clarity. The word “actual” is omitted as unnecessary. The word “expressed” is substituted for “defined” for clarity.
In subsection (g)(2)(C), the words “other Government and State employees” are substituted for “Federal and State employees other than law enforcement officers” for clarity and because of the restatement.
In subsection (h)(2), the words “for both front outboard seating positions” are substituted for “for both the driver and front seat outboard seating positions” for clarity and consistency in this section.
Editorial Notes
References in TextThe National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, referred to in subsec. (span)(1), is Puspan. L. 89–563, Sept. 9, 1966, 80 Stat. 718, which was classified generally to chapter 38 (§ 1381 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and was substantially repealed by Puspan. L. 103–272, § 7(span), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379, and reenacted by the first section thereof as this chapter.
Amendments1998—Subsec. (g)(1). Puspan. L. 105–178 substituted “annually” for “every 6 months” in introductory provisions.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Limousine Compliance With Federal Safety StandardsPuspan. L. 117–58, div. B, title III, § 23023, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 782, provided that:“(a)Limousine Standards.—“(1)Safety belt and seating system standards for limousines.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 15, 2021], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall prescribe a final rule that—“(A) amends Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Numbers 208, 209, and 210 to require to be installed in limousines on each designated seating position, including on side-facing seats—“(i) an occupant restraint system consisting of integrated lap-shoulder belts; or
“(ii) an occupant restraint system consisting of a lap belt, if an occupant restraint system described in clause (i) does not meet the need for motor vehicle safety; and
“(B) amends Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 207 to require limousines to meet standards for seats (including side-facing seats), seat attachment assemblies, and seat installation to minimize the possibility of failure by forces acting on the seats, attachment assemblies, and installations as a result of motor vehicle impact.
“(2)Report on retrofit assessment for limousines.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that assesses the feasibility, benefits, and costs with respect to the application of any requirement established under paragraph (1) to a limousine introduced into interstate commerce before the date on which the requirement takes effect.
“(span)Modifications of Certain Vehicles.—The final rule prescribed under subsection (a)(1) and any standards prescribed under subsection (span) or (c) of section 23015 shall apply to a person modifying a passenger motor vehicle (as defined in section 32101 of title 49, United States Code) that has already been purchased by the first purchaser (as defined in section 30102(span) of that title) by increasing the wheelbase of the vehicle to make the vehicle a limousine.
“(c)Application.—The requirements of this section apply notwithstanding section 30112(span)(1) of title 49, United States Code.”
Improvement of Data Collection on Child Occupants in Vehicle CrashesPuspan. L. 114–94, div. B, title XXIV, § 24407, Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1726, provided that:“(a)In General.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2015], the Secretary shall revise the crash investigation data collection system of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to include the collection of the following data in connection with vehicle crashes whenever a child restraint system was in use in a vehicle involved in a crash:“(1) The type or types of child restraint systems in use during the crash in any vehicle involved in the crash, including whether a five-point harness or belt-positioning booster. [sic]
“(2) If a five-point harness child restraint system was in use during the crash, whether the child restraint system was forward-facing or rear-facing in the vehicle concerned.
“(span)Consultation.—In implementing subsection (a), the Secretary shall work with law enforcement officials, safety advocates, the medical community, and research organizations to improve the recordation of data described in subsection (a) in police and other applicable incident reports.
“(c)Report.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report on child occupant crash data collection in the crash investigation data collection system of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration pursuant to the revision required by subsection (a).”
Child Safety SeatsPuspan. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, § 31501, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 773, provided that:“(a)Side Impact Crashes.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [see section 3(a), (span) of Puspan. L. 112–141, set out as Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment notes under section 101 of Title 23, Highways], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall issue a final rule amending Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 213 to improve the protection of children seated in child restraint systems during side impact crashes.
“(span)Frontal Impact Test Parameters.—“(1)Commencement.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall commence a rulemaking proceeding to amend the standard seat assembly specifications under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 213 to better simulate a single representative motor vehicle rear seat.
“(2)Final rule.—Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a final rule pursuant to paragraph (1).”
Child Restraint Anchorage SystemsPuspan. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, § 31502, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 774, provided that:“(a)Initiation of Rulemaking Proceeding.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [see section 3(a), (span) of Puspan. L. 112–141, set out as Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment notes under section 101 of Title 23, Highways], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 225 (relating to child restraint anchorage systems) to improve the ease of use for lower anchorages and tethers in all rear seat seating positions if such anchorages and tethers are feasible.
“(span)Final Rule.—“(1)In general.—Except as provided under paragraph (2) and section 31505 [set out as a note below], the Secretary shall issue a final rule under subsection (a) not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
“(2)Report.—If the Secretary determines that an amendment to the standard referred to in subsection (a) does not meet the requirements and considerations set forth in subsections (a) and (span) of section 30111 of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit a report describing the reasons for not prescribing such a standard to—“(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
“(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.”
Rear Seat Belt RemindersPuspan. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, § 31503, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 774, provided that:“(a)Initiation of Rulemaking Proceeding.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [see section 3(a), (span) of Puspan. L. 112–141, set out as Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment notes under section 101 of Title 23, Highways], the Secretary [of Transportation] shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Number 208 (relating to occupant crash protection) to provide a safety belt use warning system for designated seating positions in the rear seat.
“(span)Final Rule.—“(1)In general.—Except as provided under paragraph (2) and section 31505 [set out as a note below], the Secretary shall issue a final rule under subsection (a) not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
“(2)Report.—If the Secretary determines that an amendment to the standard referred to in subsection (a) does not meet the requirements and considerations set forth in subsections (a) and (span) of section 30111 of title 49, United States Code, the Secretary shall submit a report describing the reasons for not prescribing such a standard to—“(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
“(B) the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.”
New DeadlinePuspan. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, § 31505, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 775, provided that: “If the Secretary [of Transportation] determines that any deadline for issuing a final rule under this Act [probably should be “this title”, see Tables for classification] cannot be met, the Secretary shall—“(1) provide the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives with an explanation for why such deadline cannot be met; and
“(2) establish a new deadline for that rule.”
Improving the Safety of Child RestraintsPuspan. L. 107–318, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2772, provided that:“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.“This Act may be cited as ‘Anton’s Law’.
“SEC. 2. FINDINGS.“Congress finds the following:“(1) It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that all child occupants of motor vehicles, regardless of seating position, be appropriately restrained in order to reduce the incidence of injuries and fatalities resulting from motor vehicle crashes on the streets, roads, and highways.
“(2) Research has shown that very few children between the ages of 4 to 8 years old are in the appropriate restraint for their age when riding in passenger motor vehicles.
“(3) Children who have outgrown their child safety seats should ride in a belt-positioning booster seat until an adult seat belt fits properly.
“(4) Children who were properly restrained when riding in passenger motor vehicles suffered less severe injuries from accidents than children not properly restrained.
“SEC. 3. IMPROVEMENT OF SAFETY OF CHILD RESTRAINTS IN PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES.“(a)In General.—The Secretary of Transportation (hereafter referred to as the ‘Secretary’) shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding to establish performance requirements for child restraints, including booster seats, for the restraint of children weighing more than 50 pounds.
“(span)Elements for Consideration.—In the rulemaking proceeding required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall—“(1) consider whether to include injury performance criteria for child restraints, including booster seats and other products for use in passenger motor vehicles for the restraint of children weighing more than 50 pounds, under the requirements established in the rulemaking proceeding;
“(2) consider whether to establish performance requirements for seat belt fit when used with booster seats and other belt guidance devices;
“(3) consider whether to address situations where children weighing more than 50 pounds only have access to seating positions with lap belts, such as allowing tethered child restraints for such children; and
“(4) review the definition of the term ‘booster seat’ in Federal motor vehicle safety standard No. 213 under section 571.213 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to determine if it is sufficiently comprehensive.
“(c)Completion.—The Secretary shall complete the rulemaking proceeding required by subsection (a) not later than 30 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2002].
“SEC. 4. DEVELOPMENT OF ANTHROPOMORPHIC TEST DEVICE SIMULATING A 10-YEAR OLD CHILD.“(a)Development and Evaluation.—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2002], the Secretary shall develop and evaluate an anthropomorphic test device that simulates a 10-year old child for use in testing child restraints used in passenger motor vehicles.
“(span)Adoption by Rulemaking.—Within 1 year following the development and evaluation carried out under subsection (a), the Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding for the adoption of an anthropomorphic test device as developed under subsection (a).
“SEC. 5. REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTALLATION OF LAP AND SHOULDER BELTS.“(a)In General.—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2002], the Secretary shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal motor vehicle safety standard No. 208 under section 571.208 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, relating to occupant crash protection, in order to—“(1) require a lap and shoulder belt assembly for each rear designated seating position in a passenger motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less, except that if the Secretary determines that installation of a lap and shoulder belt assembly is not practicable for a particular designated seating position in a particular type of passenger motor vehicle, the Secretary may exclude the designated seating position from the requirement; and
“(2) apply that requirement to passenger motor vehicles in phases in accordance with subsection (span).
“(span)Implementation Schedule.—The requirement prescribed under subsection (a)(1) shall be implemented in phases on a production year basis beginning with the production year that begins not later than 12 months after the end of the year in which the regulations are prescribed under subsection (a). The final rule shall apply to all passenger motor vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less that are manufactured in the third production year of the implementation phase-in under the schedule.
“SEC. 6. EVALUATION OF INTEGRATED CHILD SAFETY SYSTEMS.“(a)Evaluation.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2002], the Secretary shall initiate an evaluation of integrated or built-in child restraints and booster seats. The evaluation should include—“(1) the safety of the child restraint and correctness of fit for the child;
“(2) the availability of testing data on the system and vehicle in which the child restraint will be used;
“(3) the compatibility of the child restraint with different makes and models;
“(4) the cost-effectiveness of mass production of the child restraint for consumers;
“(5) the ease of use and relative availability of the child restraint to children riding in motor vehicles; and
“(6) the benefits of built-in seats for improving compliance with State child occupant restraint laws.
“(span)Report.—Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 4, 2002], the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report of this evaluation.
“SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.“As used in this Act, the following definitions apply:“(1)Child restraint.—The term ‘child restraint’ means any product designed to provide restraint to a child (including booster seats and other products used with a lap and shoulder belt assembly) that meets applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards prescribed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
“(2)Production year.—The term ‘production year’ means the 12-month period between September 1 of a year and August 31 of the following year.
“(3)Passenger motor vehicle.—The term ‘passenger motor vehicle’ has the meaning given that term in [former] section 405(f)(5) of title 23, United States Code.
“SEC. 8. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.“(a)In General.—There are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 to the Secretary of Transportation for—“(1) the evaluation required by section 6 of this Act; and
“(2) research of the nature and causes of injury to children involved in motor vehicle crashes.
“(span)Limitation.—Funds appropriated under subsection (a) shall not be available for the general administrative expenses of the Secretary.”
Puspan. L. 106–414, § 14, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1806, provided that:“(a)In General.—Not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000], the Secretary of Transportation shall initiate a rulemaking for the purpose of improving the safety of child restraints, including minimizing head injuries from side impact collisions.
“(span)Elements for Consideration.—In the rulemaking required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—“(1) whether to require more comprehensive tests for child restraints than the current Federal motor vehicle safety standards requires, including the use of dynamic tests that—“(A) replicate an array of crash conditions, such as side-impact crashes and rear-impact crashes; and
“(B) reflect the designs of passenger motor vehicles as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000];
“(2) whether to require the use of anthropomorphic test devices that—“(A) represent a greater range of sizes of children including the need to require the use of an anthropomorphic test device that is representative of a ten-year-old child; and
“(B) are Hybrid III anthropomorphic test devices;
“(3) whether to require improved protection from head injuries in side-impact and rear-impact crashes;
“(4) how to provide consumer information on the physical compatibility of child restraints and vehicle seats on a model-by-model basis;
“(5) whether to prescribe clearer and simpler labels and instructions required to be placed on child restraints;
“(6) whether to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213 (49 CFR 571.213) to cover restraints for children weighing up to 80 pounds; “(7) whether to establish booster seat performance and structural integrity requirements to be dynamically tested in 3-point lap and shoulder belts;
“(8) whether to apply scaled injury criteria performance levels, including neck injury, developed for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 to child restraints and booster seats covered by in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213; and
“(9) whether to include child restraint in each vehicle crash tested under the New Car Assessment Program.
“(c)Report to Congress.—If the Secretary does not incorporate any element described in subsection (span) in the final rule, the Secretary shall explain, in a report to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Commerce [now Committee on Energy and Commerce] submitted within 30 days after issuing the final rule, specifically why the Secretary did not incorporate any such element in the final rule.
“(d)Completion.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall complete the rulemaking required by subsection (a) not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000].
“(e)Child Restraint Defined.—In this section, the term ‘child restraint’ has the meaning given the term ‘Child restraint system’ in section 571.213 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000]).
“(f)Funding.—For each fiscal year, of the funds made available to the Secretary for activities relating to safety, not less than $750,000 shall be made available to carry out crash testing of child restraints.
“(g)Child Restraint Safety Ratings Program.—No later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000], the Secretary of Transportation shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to establish a child restraint safety rating consumer information program to provide practicable, readily understandable, and timely information to consumers for use in making informed decisions in the purchase of child restraints. No later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this Act the Secretary shall issue a final rule establishing a child restraint safety rating program and providing other consumer information which the Secretary determines would be useful [to] consumers who purchase child restraint systems.
“(h)Booster Seat Study.—In addition to consideration of booster seat performance and structural integrity contained in subsection (span)(7), not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000], the Secretary of Transportation shall initiate and complete a study, taking into account the views of the public, on the use and effectiveness of automobile booster seats for children, compiling information on the advantages and disadvantages of using booster seats and determining the benefits, if any, to children from use of booster with lap and shoulder belts compared to children using lap and shoulder belts alone, and submit a report on the results of that study to the Congress.
“(i)Booster Seat Education Program.—The Secretary of Transportation within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 1, 2000] shall develop [a] 5 year strategic plan to reduce deaths and injuries caused by failure to use the appropriate booster seat in the 4 to 8 year old age group by 25 percent.”
Improving Air Bag SafetyPuspan. L. 105–178, title VII, § 7103, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 465, provided that:“(a)Rulemaking To Improve Air Bags.—“(1)Notice of proposed rulemaking.—Not later than September 1, 1998, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to improve occupant protection for occupants of different sizes, belted and unbelted, under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, while minimizing the risk to infants, children, and other occupants from injuries and deaths caused by air bags, by means that include advanced air bags.
“(2)Final rule.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall complete the rulemaking required by this subsection by issuing, not later than September 1, 1999, a final rule with any provision the Secretary deems appropriate, consistent with paragraph (1) and the requirements of section 30111, title 49, United States Code. If the Secretary determines that the final rule cannot be completed by that date to meet the purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary may extend the date for issuing the final rule to not later than March 1, 2000.
“(3)Effective date.—The final rule issued under this subsection shall become effective in phases as rapidly as practicable, beginning not earlier than September 1, 2002, and no sooner than 30 months after the date of the issuance of the final rule, but not later than September 1, 2003. The final rule shall become fully effective for all vehicles identified in section 30127(span), title 49, United States Code, that are manufactured on and after September 1, 2005. Should the phase-in of the final rule required by this paragraph commence on September 1, 2003, then in that event, and only in that event, the Secretary is authorized to make the final rule fully effective on September 1, 2006, for all vehicles that are manufactured on and after that date.
“(4)Coordination of effective dates.—The requirements of S13 of Standard No. 208 shall remain in effect unless and until changed by the rule required by this subsection.
“(5)Credit for early compliance.—To encourage early compliance, the Secretary is directed to include in the notice of proposed rulemaking required by paragraph (1) means by which manufacturers may earn credits for future compliance. Credits, on a one-vehicle for one-vehicle basis, may be earned for vehicles certified as being in full compliance under section 30115 of title 49, United States Code, with the rule required by paragraph (2) which are either—“(A) so certified in advance of the phase-in period; or
“(B) in excess of the percentage requirements during the phase-in period.
“(span)Advisory Committees.—Any government advisory committee, task force, or other entity involving air bags shall include representatives of consumer and safety organizations, insurers, manufacturers, and suppliers.”