View all text of Subchapter V [§ 2211 - § 2217]
§ 2213. Critical Projects
(a) Identification of projects
(1) Project submissionAny Project Sponsor may submit, so long as the Oversight Board is in operation, any existing, ongoing, or proposed project to the Revitalization Coordinator. The Revitalization Coordinator shall require such submission to include—
(A) the impact the project will have on an emergency;
(B) the availability of immediate private capital or other funds, including loan guarantees, loans, or grants to implement, operate, or maintain the project;
(C) the cost of the project and amount of Puerto Rico government funds, if any, necessary to complete and maintain the project;
(D) the environmental and economic benefits provided by the project, including the number of jobs to be created that will be held by residents of Puerto Rico and the expected economic impact, including the impact on ratepayers, if applicable;
(E) the status of the project if it is existing or ongoing; and
(F) in addition to the requirements found in subparagraphs (A) through (E), the Revitalization Coordinator may require such submission to include any or all of the following criteria that assess how the project will—
(i) reduce reliance on oil for electric generation in Puerto Rico;
(ii) improve performance of energy infrastructure and overall energy efficiency;
(iii) expedite the diversification and conversion of fuel sources for electric generation from oil to natural gas and renewables in Puerto Rico as defined under applicable Puerto Rico laws;
(iv) promote the development and utilization of energy sources found on Puerto Rico;
(v) contribute to transitioning to privatized generation capacities in Puerto Rico;
(vi) support the Energy Commission of Puerto Rico in achievement of its goal of reducing energy costs and ensuring affordable energy rates for consumers and business; or
(vii) achieve in whole or in part the recommendations, if feasible, of the study in section 505(d) of this title 1
1 See References in Text note below.
to the extent such study is completed and not inconsistent with studies or plans otherwise required under Puerto Rico laws.(2) Identification of relevant Puerto Rico Agencies
(3) Expedited Permitting Process
(A) Submission of Expedited Permitting Process
(B) Failure to provide Expedited Permitting Process
(C) Implementation and prioritization
(b) Critical Project Report
(1) In generalFor each submitted project, the Revitalization Coordinator in consultation with the Governor and relevant Puerto Rico Agencies identified in subsection (a)(2) shall develop a Critical Project Report within 60 days of the project submission, which shall include:
(A) An assessment of how well the project meets the criteria in subsection (a)(1).
(B) A recommendation by the Governor whether the project should be considered a Critical Project. If the Governor fails to provide a recommendation during the development of the Critical Project Report, the failure shall constitute a concurrence with the Revitalization Coordinator’s recommendation in subparagraph (E).
(C) In the case of a project that may affect the implementation of Land-Use Plans, as defined by Puerto Rico Act 550–2004, a determination by the Planning Board will be required within the 60-day timeframe. If the Planning Board determines such project will be inconsistent with relevant Land-Use Plans, then the project will be deemed ineligible for Critical Project designation.
(D) In the case of an Energy Project that will connect with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s transmission or distribution facilities, a recommendation by the Energy Commission of Puerto Rico, if the Energy Commission determines such Energy Project will affect an approved Integrated Resource Plan, as defined under Puerto Rico Act 54–2014. If the Energy Commission determines the Energy Project will adversely affect an approved Integrated Resource Plan, then the Energy Commission shall provide the reasons for such determination and the Energy Project shall be ineligible for Critical Project designation, provided that such determination must be made during the 60-day timeframe for the development of the Critical Project Report.
(E) A recommendation by the Revitalization Coordinator whether the project should be considered a Critical Project.
(2) Public involvement
(3) Submission to Oversight Board
(c) Action by the Oversight BoardNot later than 30 days after receiving the Critical Project Report, the Oversight Board, by majority vote, shall approve or disapprove the project as a Critical Project, if the Oversight Board—
(1) approves the project, the project shall be deemed a Critical Project; and
(2) disapproves the project, the Oversight Board shall submit to the Revitalization Coordinator in writing the reasons for disapproval.
(Pub. L. 114–187, title V, § 503, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 598.)