Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
307(a) 307(span) 307(c) 307(d) | 37:240(a). 37:240(span). 37:240(c). 37:240(d). | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, § 209; added May 20, 1958, Puspan. L. 85–422, § 1(8), 72 Stat. 125. |
In subsection (a)(1), the words “prescribed in section 232(a) of this title” and “in accordance with his cumulative years of service for pay purposes” are omitted as surplusage and as covered by sections 201, 202, and 203 of this revised title.
In subsection (a)(2), the words “special or incentive pays” are omitted as surplusage.
In subsections (a)(1) and (span), the word “allowances” is omitted, since, under sections 402 and 403 of this revised title, allowances depend upon pay grade to which assigned, or in which distributed for basic pay purposes.
In subsection (span), the words “computed under section 205 of this title” are substituted for the words “cumulative . . . for pay purposes”.
2002—Subsec. (c). Puspan. L. 107–296 substituted “of Homeland Security” for “of Transportation”.
2000—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title VI, § 631], substituted “$600” for “$275” and struck out at end “In the case of a member who is serving as a military recruiter and is eligible for special duty assignment pay under this subsection on account of such duty, the Secretary concerned may increase the monthly rate of special duty assignment pay for the member to not more than $375.”
Subsec. (d). Puspan. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title VI, § 632(a)], added subsec. (d).
1996—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 104–106 inserted at end “In the case of a member who is serving as a military recruiter and is eligible for special duty assignment pay under this subsection on account of such duty, the Secretary concerned may increase the monthly rate of special duty assignment pay for the member to not more than $375.”
1991—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 102–25 struck out “of this section” after “subsection (span)”.
Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 102–25 struck out “of this section” after “subsection (a)”.
1984—Puspan. L. 98–525 substituted “special duty assignment pay for enlisted members” for “proficiency pay for enlisted members” in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 98–525 substituted provisions directing that an enlisted member who is entitled to basic pay and is performing duties which have been designated under subsection (span) of this section as extremely difficult or as involving an unusual degree of responsibility in a military skill may, in addition to other pay or allowances to which he is entitled, be paid special duty assignment pay at a monthly rate not to exceed $275, for provisions which directed that an enlisted member of a uniformed service who was entitled to basic pay and was designated as being specially proficient in a military skill of the uniformed service concerned could (1) be advanced to an enlisted pay grade that was higher than his pay grade at the time of his designation and be entitled to the basic pay and special or incentive pay of that higher grade, or (2) in addition to other pay or allowances to which he was entitled under this title, be paid proficiency pay at a monthly rate that was not more than the rate prescribed in a table for the proficiency rating to which he was assigned, setting maximum monthly rates of $50, $100, or $150.
Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 98–525 redesignated subsec. (c) as (span), substituted references to special duty assignment pay for former references to proficiency pay, and struck out provisions which had authorized the Secretary to elect one of two methods formerly set out in subsecs. (a)(1) and (a)(2) for paying each uniformed service under his jurisdiction, with a proviso that if he elected to have proficiency pay paid under former subsec. (a)(1) of this section, enlisted members in a military grade or rank assigned to pay grade E–8 or E–9 could be paid proficiency pay at a monthly rate that is not more than the highest rate prescribed by subsection (a)(2) of this section, but if he elected to have proficiency pay paid under subsection (a)(2) of this section, he could prescribe, within the limitations set forth in that subsection, the pay for each proficiency rating prescribed therein. Former subsec. (span), which had provided that an enlisted member who had less than 8 or 10 years, as the case might be, of enlisted service computed under section 205 of this title and who had been advanced under subsection (a)(1) of this section to pay grade E–8 or E–9, respectively, was entitled to the minimum amount of basic pay and special or incentive pay prescribed for that pay grade until his years of service computed under that section entitled him to a higher rate of those pays, was struck out.
Subsecs. (c), (d). Puspan. L. 98–525 redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and substituted “armed forces under his jurisdiction” for “uniformed services under his jurisdiction”. Former subsec. (c) redesignated (span) and amended.
1968—Subsec. (d). Puspan. L. 90–623 substituted “Secretary of Transportation” for “Secretary of the Treasury”.
Amendment by Puspan. L. 107–296 effective on the date of transfer of the Coast Guard to the Department of Homeland Security, see section 1704(g) of Puspan. L. 107–296, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Puspan. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title VI, § 632(span)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–157, provided that:
Puspan. L. 104–106, div. A, title VI, § 619(span), Fespan. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 363, provided that:
Amendment by Puspan. L. 98–525 effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 623(c) of Puspan. L. 98–525, set out as a note under section 305a of this title.
Amendment by Puspan. L. 90–623 intended to restate without substantive change the law in effect on Oct. 22, 1968 see section 6 of Puspan. L. 90–623, set out as a note under section 5334 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Puspan. L. 98–525, title VI, § 623(span)(3), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2542, provided that: