Editorial Notes
References in TextSection 127 of the Trade Deficit Review Commission Act, referred to in subsecs. (span)(3) and (e), is section 127 of Puspan. L. 105–277, which is set out in a note under section 2213 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
The first day of the 107th Congress, referred to in subsec. (h), was Jan. 3, 2001.
CodificationSection was enacted as part of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001, and not as part of the U.S.-China Relations Act of 2000 which comprises this chapter.
Amendments2022—Subsec. (g). Puspan. L. 117–286 substituted “chapter 10 of title 5” for “FACA” in span and “chapter 10 of title 5” for “the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)” in text.
2014—Subsec. (c)(2). Puspan. L. 113–291 added subpars. (A) to (K) and struck out former subpars. (A) to (J) which described required contents of report.
2007—Subsec. (c)(1). Puspan. L. 110–161 substituted “December” for “June”.
2005—Subsec. (g). Puspan. L. 109–108 amended span and text of subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Commission.”
2003—Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(A), inserted “Economic and” before “Security” in section catchline.
Subsec. (a)(1), (2). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(B), inserted “Economic and” before “Security”.
Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(C)(i), inserted “Economic and” before “Security” in span.
Subsec. (span)(1). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(C)(ii), inserted “Economic and” before “Security”.
Subsec. (span)(3). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(C)(iii)(I), which directed the amendment of introductory provisions by inserting “Economic and” before “Security”, could not be executed because “Security” does not appear.
Subsec. (span)(3)(F). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(c)(1), added subpar. (F) and struck out former subpar. (F) which read as follows: “members shall be appointed to the Commission not later than 30 days after the date on which each new Congress convenes;”.
Subsec. (span)(3)(H), (4), (e)(1), (2). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(C)(iii)(II), (iv), (D)(i), (ii), which directed insertion of “Economic and” before “Security”, could not be executed because “Security” does not appear.
Subsec. (e)(3). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(D)(iii)(II), inserted “Economic and” before “Security” in second sentence.
Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(D)(iii)(I), which directed the amendment of first sentence by inserting “Economic and” before “Security”, could not be executed because “Security” does not appear.
Subsec. (e)(4), (6). Puspan. L. 108–7, § 2(span)(1)(D)(iv), (v), which directed the amendment of pars. (4) and (6) by inserting “Economic and” before “Security”, could not be executed because “Security” does not appear.
2001—Subsec. (c)(1). Puspan. L. 107–67, § 648, substituted “June” for “March”.
Subsec. (e)(3). Puspan. L. 107–67, § 645(a), inserted at end “The executive director and any personnel who are employees of the United States-China Security Review Commission shall be employees under section 2105 of title 5 for purposes of chapters 63, 81, 83, 84, 85, 87, 89, and 90 of that title.”
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Change of NameReference to the Director of Central Intelligence or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in the Director’s capacity as the head of the intelligence community deemed to be a reference to the Director of National Intelligence. Reference to the Director of Central Intelligence or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in the Director’s capacity as the head of the Central Intelligence Agency deemed to be a reference to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. See section 1081(a), (span) of Puspan. L. 108–458, set out as a note under section 3001 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
Puspan. L. 108–7, div. P, § 2(span)(2), Fespan. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 552, provided that: “Any reference in any Federal law, Executive order, rule, regulation, or delegation of authority, or any document of or relating to the United States-China Security Review Commission shall be deemed to refer to the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission.”
Effective Date of 2014 AmendmentPuspan. L. 113–291, div. A, title XII, § 1259B(span), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3579, provided that: “The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 19, 2014], and shall apply with respect to annual reports submitted under section 1238(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 [22 U.S.C. 7002(c)] after such date of enactment.”
Effective Date of 2003 AmendmentPuspan. L. 108–7, div. P, § 2(c)(3), Fespan. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 554, provided that: “This section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Fespan. 20, 2003].”
Effective Date of 2001 AmendmentPuspan. L. 107–67, title VI, § 645(span), Nov. 12, 2001, 115 Stat. 556, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect on January 3, 2001.”
Responsibilities of the CommissionPuspan. L. 108–7, div. P, § 2(c)(2), Fespan. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 553, provided that: “The United States-China Commission shall focus, in lieu of any other areas of work or study, on the following:“(A)Proliferation practices.—The Commission shall analyze and assess the Chinese role in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and other weapons (including dual use technologies) to terrorist-sponsoring states, and suggest possible steps which the United States might take, including economic sanctions, to encourage the Chinese to stop such practices.
“(B)Economic reforms and united states economic transfers.—The Commission shall analyze and assess the qualitative and quantitative nature of the shift of United States production activities to China, including the relocation of high-technology, manufacturing, and R&D facilities; the impact of these transfers on United States national security, including political influence by the Chinese Government over American firms, dependence of the United States national security industrial base on Chinese imports, the adequacy of United States export control laws, and the effect of these transfers on United States economic security, employment, and the standard of living of the American people; analyze China’s national budget and assess China’s fiscal strength to address internal instability problems and assess the likelihood of externalization of such problems.
“(C)Energy.—The Commission shall evaluate and assess how China’s large and growing economy will impact upon world energy supplies and the role the United States can play, including joint R&D efforts and technological assistance, in influencing China’s energy policy.
“(D)United states capital markets.—The Commission shall evaluate the extent of Chinese access to, and use of United States capital markets, and whether the existing disclosure and transparency rules are adequate to identify Chinese companies which are active in United States markets and are also engaged in proliferation activities or other activities harmful to United States security interests.
“(E)Corporate reporting.—The Commission shall assess United States trade and investment relationship with China, including the need for corporate reporting on United States investments in China and incentives that China may be offering to United States corporations to relocate production and R&D to China.
“(F)Regional economic and security impacts.—The Commission shall assess the extent of China’s ‘hollowing-out’ of Asian manufacturing economies, and the impact on United States economic and security interests in the region; review the triangular economic and security relationship among the United States, Taipei and Beijing, including Beijing’s military modernization and force deployments aimed at Taipei, and the adequacy of United States executive branch coordination and consultation with Congress on United States arms sales and defense relationship with Taipei.
“(G)United states-china bilateral programs.—The Commission shall assess science and technology programs to evaluate if the United States is developing an adequate coordinating mechanism with appropriate review by the intelligence community with Congress; assess the degree of non-compliance by China and United States-China agreements on prison labor imports and intellectual property rights; evaluate United States enforcement policies; and recommend what new measures the United States Government might take to strengthen our laws and enforcement activities and to encourage compliance by the Chinese.
“(H)World trade organization compliance.—The Commission shall review China’s record of compliance to date with its accession agreement to the WTO, and explore what incentives and policy initiatives should be pursued to promote further compliance by China.
“(I)Media control.—The Commission shall evaluate Chinese government efforts to influence and control perceptions of the United States and its policies through the internet, the Chinese print and electronic media, and Chinese internal propaganda.”
Similar provisions were contained in the following appropriation act:
Puspan. L. 109–108, title VI, § 635(a), Nov. 22, 2005, 119 Stat. 2346.
