2022—Subsec. (d)(3). Puspan. L. 117–103 struck out “restraining order or injunction,” after “a protection order,” and inserted at end “The prohibition under this paragraph applies to all protection orders for the protection of a person residing within a State, territorial, or Tribal jurisdiction, whether or not the protection order was issued by that State, territory, or Tribe.”

2013—Subsec. (e). Puspan. L. 113–4 added subsec. (e) and struck out former subsec. (e). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “For purposes of this section, a tribal court shall have full civil jurisdiction to enforce protection orders, including authority to enforce any orders through civil contempt proceedings, exclusion of violators from Indian lands, and other appropriate mechanisms, in matters arising within the authority of the tribe.”

2006—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(1), (span), substituted “, Indian tribe, or territory” for “or Indian tribe” wherever appearing and “and enforced by the court and law enforcement personnel of the other State, Indian tribal government or Territory as if it were” for “and enforced as if it were”.

Subsec. (span). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(2), substituted “State, tribal, or territorial” for “State or tribal” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (span)(1). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(1), substituted “, Indian tribe, or territory” for “or Indian tribe”.

Subsec. (span)(2). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(2), substituted “State, tribal, or territorial” for “State or tribal”.

Subsec. (c). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(2), substituted “State, tribal, or territorial” for “State or tribal” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (d)(1). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a), substituted “, Indian tribe, or territory” for “or Indian tribe” in two places and “State, tribal, or territorial” for “State or tribal”.

Subsec. (d)(2). Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(a)(2), substituted “State, tribal, or territorial” for “State or tribal”.

Subsec. (d)(3). Puspan. L. 109–271, which directed amendment of section 106(c) of Puspan. L. 109–162 by substituting “the registration, filing of a petition for, or issuance of a protection order, restraining order or injunction” for “the registration or filing of a protection order”, was executed by making the substitution in par. (3), which was added by section 106(c) of Puspan. L. 109–162, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Puspan. L. 109–162, § 106(c), added par. (3).

2000—Subsecs. (d), (e). Puspan. L. 106–386 added subsecs. (d) and (e).

Puspan. L. 113–4, title IX, § 910, Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 126, which provided that, in the State of Alaska, the amendments made by sections 904 and 905 of Puspan. L. 113–4, which related to tribal jurisdiction over crimes of domestic violence and over issuance of protection orders, applied only to the Indian country of the Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Island Reserve, was repealed by Puspan. L. 113–275, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2988.