1 So in original. Probably should be “paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this subsection—”.
2 So in original. Probably should be “paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subsection (a)”.
and (1) has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce, or (2) has use of or used any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including but not limited to, mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, to communicate with or broadcast to any person or group of persons prior to such overt acts, such travel or use shall be admissible proof to establish that such defendant traveled in or used such facility of interstate or foreign commerce.Editorial Notes
Amendments
1996—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 104–294 struck out par. (1) designation and redesignated subpars. (A) to (D) as pars. (1) to (4), respectively.
1994—Subsec. (a)(1). Puspan. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $10,000”.
1986—Subsec. (d). Puspan. L. 99–386 struck out “; or in the alternative shall report in writing, to the respective Houses of the Congress, the Department’s reason for not so proceeding” after “such prosecution”.