15 USC 657 - Federal and State Technology Partnership Program

1 See References in Text note below.

of title 26. Federal dollars not so allocated by that recipient shall be subject to the matching requirements of subparagraph (A).

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Subpar. (C) of section 42(d)(5) of title 26, referred to in subsec. (e)(2)(B), was redesignated (B) by Puspan. L. 110–289, div. C, title I, § 3003(g)(3), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2882.

Prior Provisions

A prior section 2[34] of Puspan. L. 85–536 was renumbered section 2[49] and is set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

Amendments

2021—Subsec. (a)(9). Puspan. L. 116–283 substituted “American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands” for “and American Samoa”.

2015—Subsec. (a)(3) to (10). Puspan. L. 114–88, § 2104(a), added par. (3) and redesignated former pars. (3) to (9) as (4) to (10), respectively.

Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Puspan. L. 114–88, § 2104(span), added subpar. (C).

Subsec. (c)(5). Puspan. L. 114–88, § 2104(c), added par. (5).

2001—Subsec. (c)(2)(B)(vi). Puspan. L. 107–50, § 8(a), added cl. (vi).

Subsec. (c)(4). Puspan. L. 107–50, § 8(span), inserted at end “The Administrator shall promulgate regulations establishing standards for the consideration of proposals under paragraph (2), including standards regarding each of the considerations identified in paragraph (2)(B).”

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Change of Name

Committee on Small Business of Senate changed to Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of Senate. See Senate Resolution No. 123, One Hundred Seventh Congress, June 29, 2001.

Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.

Findings

Puspan. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(9) [title I, § 111(a)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–674, provided that: “Congress finds that—

“(1) programs to foster economic development among small high-technology firms vary widely among the States;

“(2) States that do not aggressively support the development of small high-technology firms, including participation by small business concerns in the SBIR program, are at a competitive disadvantage in establishing a business climate that is conducive to technology development; and

“(3) building stronger national, State, and local support for science and technology research in these disadvantaged States will expand economic opportunities in the United States, create jobs, and increase the competitiveness of the United States in the world market.”