Collapse to view only § 1803. Study with respect to inland waterway user taxes and charges
- §§ 1801, 1802. Repealed.
- § 1803. Study with respect to inland waterway user taxes and charges
- § 1804. Inland and intracoastal waterways of the United States
§§ 1801, 1802. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–662, title XIV, § 1405(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4271
§ 1803. Study with respect to inland waterway user taxes and charges
(a) Study directedThe Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Energy, the Attorney General of the United States, the Secretary of the Army, the Chairman of the Water Resources Council, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall—
(1) make a full and complete study with respect to inland waterway user taxes and charges, and
(2) make findings and policy recommendations with respect thereto.
Such study shall include (but shall not be limited to) a consideration of the matters listed in subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this section.
(b) Considerations relating to the taxing mechanism
(1) The extent to which the Federal Government should seek to recover some or all of Federal expenditures for the benefit of inland waterway transportation from the users of the facilities for which such expenditures are made.
(2) The various forms of inland waterway user taxes and charges which could be established.
(3) The various methods of collecting inland waterway user taxes and charges, and the administrative costs of such taxes and charges.
(4) The classes and categories of users and other persons on whom inland waterway user taxes and charges should be imposed.
(5) The waterways of the United States (including the Great Lakes, deep draft channels, and coastal ports) which should be included in any system of user taxes and charges, together with the economic effects of such taxes and charges.
(6) The use of revenues derived from inland waterway user taxes and charges, including consideration of changes in, or alternatives to, the Trust Fund mechanism.
(c) Considerations relating to economic effectsThe economic effects of waterway user taxes and charges on—
(1) Carriers and usersOn—
(A) carriers and shippers using the inland waterways, and
(B) users (including ultimate consumers) of commodities which are transported on the inland waterways.
(2) Regions, etc.On—
(A) existing investment in industrial plants, agricultural interests, and commercial enterprises, and on related employment, in regions of the country served by inland water transportation directly or in combination with other modes, and
(B) future economic growth prospects in such regions, including anticipated shifts of industry and employment to other areas together with an evaluation of effects on regional economies and their development, including consistency with Federal policies as set forth in other legislation.
(3) Small business and industrial concentration and competitionOn—
(A) small business enterprise, and
(B) industrial concentration and competition, both within the transportation industry and in any line of commerce (within the meaning of the antitrust laws).
(4) CompetitorsOn the freight rates charged by other modes of transportation and the extent of short-term and long-term diversion of traffic from the inland waterways to such other modes. In considering such diversion of traffic, there shall also be considered the effects of such diversion on—
(A) the development of alternative sources of supply and on alternative modes of transportation and alternative routing to market,
(B) the comparative safety of the handling and transportation of hazardous materials, and
(C) the comparative energy efficiency of the modes and routes of the transportation involved.
(5) Prices
(6) Balance of payments
(d) Considerations relating to economic feasibility of waterway improvement projects; level of benefits from waterway expenditures
(1) The effects of inland waterway user taxes and charges on the economic feasibility of inland waterway improvement projects.
(2) The comparative levels of benefits received from Federal expenditures on inland waterways for—
(A) commercial uses, and
(B) other uses, including (but not limited to) recreation, reclamation, water supply, low-flow augmentation, fish and wildlife enhancement, hydroelectric power, flood control, and irrigation uses.
(e) Considerations relating to Federal assistance
(1) The extent of past, present, and expected future Federal assistance to the several modes of freight transportation. Such consideration shall include an evaluation and comparison of the public benefits resulting from such assistance to each of the several transportation modes in terms of adequacy, efficiency, and economy of service, safety, technological progress, and energy conservation. The Federal assistance considered under this paragraph shall include all forms of such assistance, such as tax advantages, direct grants, rate adjustments for improvement purposes, assumption of pension fund liabilities, loans, guarantees, capital participation, revenues from land grants, and provision of right-of-way operation, maintenance, and improvement.
(2) The competitive effects of past, present, and expected future Federal expenditures on inland waterways on competitive modes of transportation.
(3) The need for Federal assistance to agricultural, industrial, and other interests affected by inland waterway user taxes and charges.
(f) Considerations relating to policy and future developmentThe effects of inland waterway user taxes and charges on—
(1) The achievement of the objectives of the National Transportation Policy as set forth in sections 10101 and 13101 of title 49.
(2) The expansion and improvement of the inland waterways determined to be necessary by the Secretary of the Army under section 158 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–587) or estimated to be necessary under paragraph (3).
(3) The requirements of the Nation through the year 2000 for transportation service, the portion thereof which should be provided by inland waterway carriers, and an estimate of the expansion and improvement of inland waterway capacity necessary to meet such requirements.
(g) “Inland waterway user taxes and charges” defined
(h) Report
(i)
(Pub. L. 95–502, title II, § 205, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1698; Pub. L. 104–88, title III, § 338, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 954.)
§ 1804. Inland and intracoastal waterways of the United States
For purposes of section 4042 of title 26 (relating to tax on fuel used in commercial transportation on inland waterways) and for purposes of section 1802 1
1 See References in Text note below.
of this title, the following inland and intracoastal waterways of the United States are described in this section:(1) Alabama-Coosa Rivers: From junction with the Tombigbee River at river mile (hereinafter referred to as RM) 0 to junction with Coosa River at RM 314.
(2) Allegheny River: From confluence with the Monongahela River to form the Ohio River at RM 0 to the head of the existing project at East Brady, Pennsylvania, RM 72.
(3) Apalachicola-Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers: Apalachicola River from mouth at Apalachicola Bay (intersection with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) RM 0 to junction with Chattachoochee 2
2 So in original. Probably should be “Chattahoochee”.
and Flint Rivers at RM 107.8. Chattachoochee 2 River from junction with Apalachicola and Flint Rivers at RM 0 to Columbus, Georgia, at RM 155 and Flint River, from junction with Apalachicola and Chattahoochee Rivers at RM 0 to Bainbridge, Georgia, at RM 28.(4) Arkansas River (McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System): From junction with Mississippi River at RM 0 to port of Catoosa, Oklahoma, at RM 448.2.
(5) Atchafalaya River: From RM 0 at its intersection with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Morgan City, Louisiana, upstream to junction with Red River at RM 116.8.
(6) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway: Two inland water routes approximately paralleling the Atlantic coast between Norfolk, Virginia, and Miami, Florida, for 1,192 miles via both the Albermarle 3
3 So in original. Probably should be “Albemarle”.
and Chesapeake Canal and Great Dismal Swamp Canal routes.(7) Black Warrior-Tombigbee-Mobile Rivers: Black Warrior River System from RM 2.9, Mobile River (at Chickasaw Creek) to confluence with Tombigbee River at RM 45. Tombigbee River (to Demopolis at RM 215.4) to port of Birmingham, RM’s 374–411 and upstream to head of navigation on Mulberry Fork (RM 429.6), Locust Fork (RM 407.8), and Sipsey Fork (RM 430.4).
(8) Columbia River (Columbia-Snake Rivers Inland Waterways): From The Dalles at RM 191.5 to Pasco, Washington (McNary Pool), at RM 330, Snake River from RM 0 at the mouth to RM 231.5 at Johnson Bar Landing, Idaho.
(9) Cumberland River: Junction with Ohio River at RM 0 to head of navigation, upstream to Carthage, Tennessee, at RM 313.5.
(10) Green and Barren Rivers: Green River from junction with the Ohio River at RM 0 to head of navigation at RM 149.1.
(11) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway: From St. Mark’s River, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas, 1,134.5 miles.
(12) Illinois Waterway (Calumet-Sag Channel): From the junction of the Illinois River with the Mississippi River RM 0 to Chicago Harbor at Lake Michigan, approximately RM 350.
(13) Kanawha River: From junction with Ohio River at RM 0 to RM 90.6 at Deepwater, West Virginia.
(14) Kaskaskia River: From junction with the Mississippi River at RM 0 to RM 36.2 at Fayetteville, Illinois.
(15) Kentucky River: From junction with Ohio River at RM 0 to confluence of Middle and North Forks at RM 258.6.
(16) Lower Mississippi River: From Baton Rouge, Louisiana, RM 233.9 to Cairo, Illinois, RM 953.8.
(17) Upper Mississippi River: From Cairo, Illinois, RM 953.8 to Minneapolis, Minnesota, RM 1,811.4.
(18) Missouri River: From junction with Mississippi River at RM 0 to Sioux City, Iowa, at RM 734.8.
(19) Monongahela River: From junction with Allegheny River to form the Ohio River at RM 0 to junction of the Tygart and West Fork Rivers, Fairmont, West Virginia, at RM 128.7.
(20) Ohio River: From junction with the Mississippi River at RM 0 to junction of the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, at RM 981.
(21) Ouachita-Black Rivers: From the mouth of the Black River at its junction with the Red River at RM 0 to RM 351 at Camden, Arkansas.
(22) Pearl River: From junction of West Pearl River with the Rigolets at RM 0 to Bogalusa, Louisiana, RM 58.
(23) Red River: From RM 0 to the mouth of Cypress Bayou at RM 236.
(24) Tennessee River: From junction with Ohio River at RM 0 to confluence with Holstein and French Rivers at RM 652.
(25) White River: From RM 9.8 to RM 255 at Newport, Arkansas.
(26) Willamette River: From RM 21 upstream of Portland, Oregon, to Harrisburg, Oregon, at RM 194.
(27) Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway: From its confluence with the Tennessee River to the Warrior River at Demopolis, Alabama.
(Pub. L. 95–502, title II, § 206, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1700; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 99–662, title XIV, § 1404(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4270.)