Collapse to view only § 1532. Statements to accompany significant regulatory actions
- § 1531. Regulatory process
- § 1532. Statements to accompany significant regulatory actions
- § 1533. Small government agency plan
- § 1534. State, local, and tribal government input
- § 1535. Least burdensome option or explanation required
- § 1536. Assistance to Congressional Budget Office
- § 1537. Pilot program on small government flexibility
- § 1538. Annual statements to Congress on agency compliance
§ 1531. Regulatory process
Each agency shall, unless otherwise prohibited by law, assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector (other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate requirements specifically set forth in law).
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 201, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 64.)
§ 1532. Statements to accompany significant regulatory actions
(a) In generalUnless otherwise prohibited by law, before promulgating any general notice of proposed rulemaking that is likely to result in promulgation of any rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any 1 year, and before promulgating any final rule for which a general notice of proposed rulemaking was published, the agency shall prepare a written statement containing—
(1) an identification of the provision of Federal law under which the rule is being promulgated;
(2) a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the anticipated costs and benefits of the Federal mandate, including the costs and benefits to State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector, as well as the effect of the Federal mandate on health, safety, and the natural environment and such an assessment shall include—
(A) an analysis of the extent to which such costs to State, local, and tribal governments may be paid with Federal financial assistance (or otherwise paid for by the Federal Government); and
(B) the extent to which there are available Federal resources to carry out the intergovernmental mandate;
(3) estimates by the agency, if and to the extent that the agency determines that accurate estimates are reasonably feasible, of—
(A) the future compliance costs of the Federal mandate; and
(B) any disproportionate budgetary effects of the Federal mandate upon any particular regions of the nation or particular State, local, or tribal governments, urban or rural or other types of communities, or particular segments of the private sector;
(4) estimates by the agency of the effect on the national economy, such as the effect on productivity, economic growth, full employment, creation of productive jobs, and international competitiveness of United States goods and services, if and to the extent that the agency in its sole discretion determines that accurate estimates are reasonably feasible and that such effect is relevant and material; and
(5)
(A) a description of the extent of the agency’s prior consultation with elected representatives (under section 1534 of this title) of the affected State, local, and tribal governments;
(B) a summary of the comments and concerns that were presented by State, local, or tribal governments either orally or in writing to the agency; and
(C) a summary of the agency’s evaluation of those comments and concerns.
(b) Promulgation
(c) Preparation in conjunction with other statement
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 202, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 64.)
§ 1533. Small government agency plan
(a) Effects on small governments
Before establishing any regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments, agencies shall have developed a plan under which the agency shall—
(1) provide notice of the requirements to potentially affected small governments, if any;
(2) enable officials of affected small governments to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory proposals containing significant Federal intergovernmental mandates; and
(3) inform, educate, and advise small governments on compliance with the requirements.
(b) Authorization of appropriations
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 203, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 65.)
§ 1534. State, local, and tribal government input
(a) In general
(b) Meetings between State, local, tribal and Federal officers
Chapter 10 of title 5 shall not apply to actions in support of intergovernmental communications where—
(1) meetings are held exclusively between Federal officials and elected officers of State, local, and tribal governments (or their designated employees with authority to act on their behalf) acting in their official capacities; and
(2) such meetings are solely for the purposes of exchanging views, information, or advice relating to the management or implementation of Federal programs established pursuant to public law that explicitly or inherently share intergovernmental responsibilities or administration.
(c) Implementing guidelines
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 204, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 65; Pub. L. 117–286, § 4(a)(1), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4305.)
§ 1535. Least burdensome option or explanation required
(a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), before promulgating any rule for which a written statement is required under section 1532 of this title, the agency shall identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and from those alternatives select the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule, for—
(1) State, local, and tribal governments, in the case of a rule containing a Federal intergovernmental mandate; and
(2) the private sector, in the case of a rule containing a Federal private sector mandate.
(b) Exception
The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply unless—
(1) the head of the affected agency publishes with the final rule an explanation of why the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome method of achieving the objectives of the rule was not adopted; or
(2) the provisions are inconsistent with law.
(c) OMB certification
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 205, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)
§ 1536. Assistance to Congressional Budget Office
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall—
(1) collect from agencies the statements prepared under section 1532 of this title; and
(2) periodically forward copies of such statements to the Director of the Congressional Budget Office on a reasonably timely basis after promulgation of the general notice of proposed rulemaking or of the final rule for which the statement was prepared.
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 206, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)
§ 1537. Pilot program on small government flexibility
(a) In general
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with Federal agencies, shall establish pilot programs in at least 2 agencies to test innovative, and more flexible regulatory approaches that—
(1) reduce reporting and compliance burdens on small governments; and
(2) meet overall statutory goals and objectives.
(b) Program focus
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 207, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 67.)
§ 1538. Annual statements to Congress on agency compliance
No later than 1 year after March 22, 1995, and annually thereafter, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the Congress, including the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the House of Representatives, a written report detailing compliance by each agency during the preceding reporting period with the requirements of this subchapter.
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 208, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 67.)